Back to My Southern Family Home Page
Mother: Cassandra MEREDITH? |
2 Rebecca Abney + Edward Dean b: ABT. 1700 d: BET. 2 APR - 18
JUN 1761
_GEORGE ABNEY _______+
| (1613 - 1661) m 1650
_Dannett ABNEY "the Immigrant"_|
| (1659 - 1733) |
| |_Bathshua____________
| (1630 - 1706) m 1650
_Abraham ABNEY _______|
| (1702 - 1783) m 1738 |
| | _Joseph LEE _________+
| | | (1630 - ....)
| |_Mary LEE _____________________|
| (1663 - 1732) |
| |_____________________
|
|
|--Rebecca ABNEY
| (1740 - ....)
| _____________________
| |
| _(RESEARCH QUERY) MEREDITH ____|
| | |
| | |_____________________
| |
|_Cassandra MEREDITH? _|
(1720 - ....) m 1738 |
| _____________________
| |
|_______________________________|
|
|_____________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Effie J. |
_George N. ALVIS C.S.A._+
| (1836 - 1874) m 1857
_Franklin Moses ALVIS _|
| (1859 - 1947) m 1880 |
| |_Sarah E. LIPE _________
| (1837 - 1917) m 1857
_George N. ALVIS ____|
| (1882 - 1947) |
| | _Pleasant HELTON Sr.____+
| | | (1817 - 1873) m 1842
| |_Matilda Ann HELTON ___|
| (1859 - 1902) m 1880 |
| |_Elizabeth NEIGHBORS ___
| (.... - 1900) m 1842
|
|--James F. ALVIS
| (1908 - ....)
| ________________________
| |
| _______________________|
| | |
| | |________________________
| |
|_Effie J.____________|
(1880 - ....) |
| ________________________
| |
|_______________________|
|
|________________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Elizabeth STANLEY |
"The Spangler Farm, where the 11th Corps set up a Field
Hospital. It was here on July 3rd, 1863, after being wounded,
Brig. General Lewis A. Armistead, C.S.A. was brought. Countless
others that had been wounded during the Battle of Gettysburg
were also taken here.
The Summer Kitchen on the Spangler Farm. This building was used
by the 11th Corps, and it is here where General Armistead died
on July 5th, 1863 about 9:00 AM.
This quote is from a letter home, of Private Justus Silliman of
H. Company, 17th Connecticut Volunteer Infantry, dated 7 July
1863: (spelling and capitalization are original):
"The rebel Gen Armstead who was wounded and a prisoner was taken
to this hospital and has since died. he was rather past middle
aged. he is from Va. and one of the reb wounded says he was one
of the best disciplinarians in their army.""
http://pw1.netcom.com/~buck1755/spangler.htm
http://pw2.netcom.com/~buck1755/laa.htm
Southern Historical Society Papers.
Notes and Queries.
Did General L. A. Armistead Fight on the Federal Side at First
Manassas ?
"General Abner Doubleday, in his "Chancellorsville and
Gettysburg" ( page 195 ), says: "Armistead was shot down by the
side of the gun he had taken. It is said he had fought on our
side in the first battle of Bull Run, but had been seduced by
Southern affiliations to join in the rebellion, and now dying in
the effort to extend the area of slavery over the free States,
he saw with a clearer vision that he had been engaged in an
unholy cause, and said to one of our officers, how leaner over
him: 'Tell General Hancock I have wronged him, and have wronged
my country.'"
Now, we have only quoted this statement in order to pronounce it
without, the shadow of foundation, and to express our surprise
that a soldier of General Doubleday's position should thus
recklessly reflect on the honor of a brave foeman upon the
flimsy "it is said," and the camp rumor of "one of our officer."
But the man who could gravely assert that the Confederates were
fighting "to extend the area of slavery over the free States,"
is probably sufficiently blinded by his prejudices to believe
anything to the detriment of "Rebels."
But as cumulative evidence of the utter falsity of the slander
to which General Doubleday still adheres, we give the following
statement of the Rev. Theodore Gerrish, (now pastor of the First
Methodist Church, Bangor, Maine, but during the war a gallant
soldier in the Twentieth Maine Regiment,) author of
"Reminiscences of the War."
In a letter to the Secretary, dated March 1st, 1883, Mr. Gerrish
says:
"One of my church members, a very reliable gentleman, whose
address is W. H. Moore, Cumberland street, Bangor, was formerly
a member of the Ninety-Seventh New York Regiment, which, at
Gettysburg, was in Robinson's Division of the First Corps. He
was wounded on the third day and taken to a hospital in the
rear. General Armistead was brought to the same hospital and
placed beside him. Brother Moore had never read the discussion
of General Doubleday's statements about General Armistead at
Gettysburg, but when I learned that he saw General A., I asked
him what opinion he formed of the General from what words he
heard him utter. He replied that the General's character: I. An
intense, all-consuming desire for the Confederates to win the
battle. 2. To die like a soldier. Brother Moore scouts the idea
of General Armistead's making use of any such language as
General Doubleday attributes to him. I have given you the
substance of his statement, and you can put it into any form or
make any use of it you may see fit."
With thanks to Mr. Gerrish and Mr. Moore for their generous
defence of the memory of a gallant Confederate, we add the above
to the letters of Colonel R. W. Martin, General Hancock, and
General Bingham, and respectfully submit that this testimony
refutes, beyond all cavil, the reckless slander which General
Doubleday based on "camp rumor," and to which he clings with a
persistence which savors more of the blindness of the partisan
than the calmness of the true historian.
Volume X, Richmond, VA, June 1882
No. 7 July
Did General L. A. Armistead fight on the Federal side at first
Manassas ?
In our last issue we pronounced General Doubbleday's statement
in reference to this gallant soldier "without the shadow of
foundation," and we are collecting the most conclusive proofs,
which we will hereafter submit. Meantime we refer the reader to
Colonel Preston Johnston's "Life of Albert Sidney Johnston" (
pp. 279, 280, 282, and 291 ), where it is show that Armistead
was in California when the war broke out - that he promptly
resigned his commission as Major in the United States army -
that he joined General Albert Sidney Johnston and his party in
their perilous overland journey to Texas - that he bore his full
share of the hardships and dangers which those noble patriots
encountered in order to reach the Confederacy and tender their
swords to the land that gave them birth - and that having left
Los Angeles on the 16th of June, 1861, and arrived at Mesilla on
the 28th of July, it was as much a physical impossibility that
Armistead could have been at Manassas on the 21st of July, as it
was a moral impossibility that a man of his sentiments and his
high sense of honor, could have drawn his sword against his
native Virginia.
Volume X. Richmond Virginia, August - September 1882
No’s 8 and 9 August and September
Did General Armistead Fight on the Federal Side at First
Manassas or Confess when Dying at Gettysburg that He had been
Engaged in an "Unholy Cause ?"
We have, in previous "Notes and Queries," answered in the
negative both of these questions; but we now submit the
following conclusive statement of the whole case.
General Abner Doubleday in his book on "Chancellorsville and
Gettysburg" ( page 195 ), makes the following remarkable
statement in describing the charge of Pickett's Division. * *
* "Armistead was shot down by the side of the gun he had taken.
It is said he had fought on our side in the first battle at Bull
Run, but had been seduced by Southern affiliations for join in
the rebellion, and now dying in the effort to extend the areal
of slavery over the free States, he saw with a clearer vision
that he had been engaged in an unholy cause, and said to one of
our officers who leaned over him: "Tell Hancock I have wronged
him and have wronged my country."
The friends of General Armistead are indignant at this statement
which they pronounce a slander "out of the whole cloth," and are
anxious that its refutation should have the widest circulation.
We, therefore, submit the following vindication of as gallant a
gentleman as every served his country in the old army - as
conscientious a patriot as ever followed his convictions of duty
into the Confederate army:
1. In reference to the charge that he fought on the "Union" side
at First Manassas ( Bull Run ), it is easy to show that it was a
physical impossibility for him to have been present at that
battle on either side.
General L. A. Armistead was the son of General Walker K.
Armistead, of the old army, was himself a "West-Pointer,"
entered the Mexican war as First Lieutenant, was breveted
Captain for "gallant and meritorious conduct" at Contreras, and
Churubusco, and Major for his conduct at Molino del Rey. In
March, 1855, he was commissioned Captain in the Sixth Infantry,
and at the breaking out of the war he had been made Major and
was serving on the Pacific coast. When Albert Sidney Johnston
resigned his commission in the United States army, and, after
being relieved by General Sumner, begun his weary and perilous
journey across the plains. Major Armistead accompanied him.
General Johnston wrote as follows to his wife from Vallecito:
VALLECITO, 130 MILES TO YUMA }
SUNDAY, June 30, 1861. }
....... I received your letter of June 25th, by Major Armistead
who arrived here this morning. Our party is now as large as need
be desired for safety or convenience in traveling. They are good
men and well armed. Late of the army we have Major Armistead,
Lieutenants Hardcastle, Brewer, Riley, Shaaf, Mallory, and
Wickliffe."....
In a description of the journey Captain Gift, who was of the
party, says:..... "We had now crossed one hundred miles of
desert and near the Colorado and Fort YUMA. It was necessary to
approach the place with caution, as a trap might be set for us.
A scout was sent forward, and at noon, it being July the 4th, we
heard the national salute. The scout returned and reported all
of the officers of the garrison sick, and that we could cross
the river without fear. In the afternoon we camped in sight of
the post, at the village on the west bank of the river. We
stationed sentinels, and preserved our military appearance.
Major Armistead was the first sentinel on post, and was
approached by a soldier from the garrison, who was one of the
Major's old regiment, and who desired a parley. He had come with
a proposition from some of the soldiers to desert over to us,
and then to seized the place and plunder it. But for the
General's coolness on that occasion, we would in all likelihood
have left Fort YUMA behind as a heap of smoking ruins."
Colonel Wm. Preston Johnson in his "Life of General Albert
Sidney Johnston" ( from which the above extracts are taken ),
goes on to narrate other interesting details of this journey,
and ( on page 291 ) gives an "Intinerary" which shows every
stage of the route from June 16th, 1861, when the party left Los
Angels, to July 28th when they arrived at Mesilla.
If further confirmation were needed we might give other proofs,
but will only submit the following letter:
SAFE DEPOSIT CO., OF ST. LOUIS, 513 LOCUST STREET, ST. LOUIS, }
July 20th, 1882. }
Rev. J. Wm. Jones, Secretary of S. H. Society:
Dear Sir, - In your issue of July, I find this in your Notes and
Queries: "Did General Armistead fight on the Federal side at
First Manassas?" General A. Sidney Johnston, Captain ( or Major
) Armistead with other officers of the army who had resigned in
California, arrived at Mesilla on the 27th of July, 1861, and
were my quests for a week, during which time they assisted us in
the capture of a large amount of stores and material, also
forcing the evacuation of the posts west of the Rio Grands.
Yours respectfully,
G. A. HAYWOOD,
Secretary Safe Deposit Company.
Thus it is in proof that General Armistead was in California
when his State seceded, and the war broke out - that as soon as
he heard of it he resigned - that he was with General A. S.
Johnston in his famous journey across the plains, and that he
arrived at Mesilla a week after the first battle of Manassas (
or Bull Run ), was fought on the 21st of July, 1861, and that it
was, therefore, as much a physical impossibility that Armistead
could have been present at the battle, as it was a moral
impossibility that he could, with his convictions, have drawn
his sword against his native State, his kindred, his own people.
General Doubleday's repetition of this rumor is as unworthy of
the candor of a brave soldier, as it is incompatible with the
pains-taking of the accurate historian.
2. The other count in the indictment, viz: that General
Armistead, when dying, "saw with a clearer vision, that he had
been engaged in an unholy cause, and said to one of our
officers, who leaned over him, 'tell Hancock I have wronged him,
and have wronged my country,'" is rather more difficult to meet
with positive proof, but we have been able to secure evidence
amounting to a moral certainly that this also is utterly untrue.
Major Armistead made his choice calmly, deliberately, and with
all of the facts before him. With all of his devotion to the
Union, love for "the old flag," and attachment to his brother
officers, he had decided that he could neither fight against the
South, nor remain neutral in the great struggle; and he made his
perilous journey, reached Richmond, tendered his sword to the
Confederacy, and was made Colonel of the 57th Virginia Regiment,
and in April, 1862, Brigadier-General.
In all of these positions he served faithfully, and gallantly -
none of his comrades ever heard the slightest intimation that he
doubted the justice of the cause for which he fought, and it
would take proof of the very strongest character to convince
those who knew him that he confessed when dying, that he had
been battling for an "unholy cause."
His intimate friend, Colonel R. H. Dulaney, of Loundoun county,
Virginia, writes: "Of course, we cannot tell what Lewis said to
the Federal officer when captured. He might have regretted the
necessity of the war, but he would have denied every principle
he had held during his life if what General Doubleday says were
true."
His friend, General Wm. H. Payne, of Warrenton, Virginia, and
his old staff officer, Major Peyton Randolph, are equally
emphatic in denying the moral possibility of Armistead's using
any such language, when himself.
We have a letter from Colonel R. W. Martin, of Pittsylvania
county, who was wounded at General Armistead's side, who had
frequent conversation with Federal officers who ministered to
Armistead in his last moments, and who not only heard nothing of
this recantation, but indignantly denies its possibility,
saying; "General Armistead was no hypocrite, he could not have
felt that he was sinning against his country, and have been the
brave and gallant defender of the cause that he was - for no
life lost during the struggle was more freely and willingly
sacrificed for principle than was his."
Charles H. Barnes, in his "History of the Philadelphia Brigade,"
( pp. 190-192,) gives an appreciative notice of General
Armistead's gallantry, and death, but puts no such words into
his mouth, nor do any of the other numerous writers on
Gettysburg, so far as we have seen.
But in addition to this negative testimony, we submit the
following correspondence, which explains itself, and settles the
question beyond peradventure:
LETTER TO GENERAL HANCOCK.
OFFICE SOUTHERN HISTORICAL SOCIETY, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, July 10,
1882.
General W. S. Hancock:
Dear Sir, - I send you by this mail the June number of Southern
Historical Society Papers, and beg leave to call your attention
to the first item of Notes and Queries, ( page 284,) in
reference to General L. A. Armistead. Of the first statement -
that General Armistead fought on the Federal side at first
Manassas - we have the most positive refutation.
In reference to the alleged message to you, I beg to ask if you
ever received such a message, and if so, had you any reason to
doubt General Armistead's being himself at the time ? To be
frank, General Armistead's relatives and friends are very
indignant at this statement, and look upon it as leaving a stain
upon the memory of that gallant soldier, which they are anxious
to wipe out, and they are fully satisfied that either there is
some mistake about the terms of the message, or else that he was
delirious when he sent it.
In confirmation of this view we have always understood that you
saw General Armistead personally just after he was wounded, and
the kindness with which you received and treated him, has always
been a fragrant memory of those terrible days, when brother
fought brother - each from honest conviction that he was
maintaining the right. Now if it was true that you had a
personal interview, it does not appear why General Armistead
should have sent you such a message. Was there anything in your
intercourse during that interview, ( may I ask ?) which gave
color to this alleged message ?
I am sure you will pardon the liberty I taken in addressing you
this letter, which is prompted by a desire to vindicate General
Armistead, and a conviction that the gallant soldier whom I
address will be only too ready to do justice to the memory of
his old friend.
Waiving the question of who was right, and who was wrong in that
great struggle, all who knew General Armistead must feel that he
followed the fortunes of the State that gave him birth, from
conscientious convictions of duty, and those who knew him well,
be slow to believe that after leading his men to the heights of
Gettysburg, with unsurpassed heroism, he whimpered and repented
of his course after he received his fatal wound-unless indeed he
was delirious from the effects of that wound.
Begging an early reply to this letter, I am, with high respect,
and with best wishes for your health and happiness,
Very truly, your obedient servant,
J. WM. JONES,
Secretary Southern Historical Society.
To this letter there was the following reply:
LETTER FROM GENERAL HANCOCK,
GOVERNOR'S ISLAND, NEW YORK,
July 15th, 1882.
Rev. J. Wm. Jones, No. 7, Library Floor
State Capitol, Richmond,. Virginia:
Dear Sir, - Your favor of the 10th instant was duly received. I
have enclosed your letter referring to General Armistead on the
field of Gettysburg, to General H. H. Bingham, M. C., from
Philadelphia. He was the officer to whom the message was
delivered, and is the best witness in the case.
I have no doubt that he will answer your inquiry fully. I am,
Yours very truly,
WINGFIELD S. HANCOCK.
On July the 20th, General Hancock sent us the following:
LETTER FROM GENERAL BINGHAM.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
WASHINGTON, D. C. July 19th, 1882.
My Dear General:
Your favor of July 14th, covering enclosures from Southern
Historical Society Papers, duly received and contents noted.
Of course, I cannot now recall all the details in the matter of
General Armistead's condition and words at the time of his
capture, July 3, 1863; but my report, made to you immediately
following the battle, is correct in every particular. Armistead,
after I informed him the I was an officer upon your staff, and
would deliver any personal effects that he might desire
forwarded to his family, made use of the words, as I now recall
them, "Say to General Hancock for me, that I have done him, and
you all, a grievous ( or serious ) injury, which I shall always
regret."
His condition at the time, was that of a man seriously wounded,
completely exhausted, and seemingly broken-spirited. I had him
carried immediately to the hospital. The physician in charge, or
who attended his wounds, could more specifically give testimony
as to his mental condition.
I return to you the letter of J. Wm. Jones, Secretary of the
Southern Historical Society.
Very truly yours,
HENRY H. BINGHAM.
Major - General W. S. HANCOCK,
New York City, N. Y.
It will be seen from the above, ( which we doubt not is an
entirely accurate statement of General Bingham's recollection of
what occurred, except that he does not enter into the details of
his kindness to General Armistead, which we will ever cherish in
grateful remembrance,) that the message actually sent by the
dying hero, was a very different one from that which General
Doubleday gives.
Mortally wounded, "completely exhausted," [ he had arisen from a
sick bed, against the remonstrances of surgeons and friends, to
go into that charge,] and no doubt "broken-spirited," when he
saw his gallant band hurled back by overwhelming odds from the
position they had so heroically won-General Armistead received
unexpected kindness from his old comrade and intimate friend,
General Hancock, from whom he had been estranged by the events
of the war, was deeply touched by it, and very naturally sent
the message: "Say to General Hancock for me, that I have done
him, and you all grievous injury, which I shall always regret."
i. e., I have wronged you by cherishing bitter, vindictive,
feelings towards old friends, who, in this hour of my extreme
need, meet me with this great kindness. The message contains not
one word of regret for the service he had rendered the
Confederacy-not one intimation that he now "saw with clearer
vision" that he had "wronged his country," or had been engaged
in an "unholy cause" - and in thus changing the words, and
forcing their meaning, General Doubleday proves that he lacks
the calmness of the historian, and shows the same bitter spirit
of the partizan as when he recklessly affirms that we poor
Confederates were fighting "to extend the area of slavery over
the free States."
The Confederate charge upon the heights of Gettysburg is a grand
episode in history of which every true American should be proud.
There was no more conspicuous figure in that grant battle
picture than brave old Armistead who led his men with
characteristic heroism, and fell on the crest of the battle
wave, bequeathing to his people a name above reproach.
We enter our burning protest against having that fair name and
fame tarnished by the flippant, reckless, pen of General
Doubleday, whose book will be of little value to the future
historian if this is a fair specimen of his historic accuracy."
http://pw2.netcom.com/~buck1755/shsp1.htm
[330811]
The Summer Kitchen on the Spangler Farm.
_William ARMISTEAD of "Hesse"_+
| (1715 - 1775) m 1740
_John ARMISTEAD of "Hesse"_|
| (1740 - ....) m 1764 |
| |_Mary BOWLES _________________+
| (1725 - ....) m 1740
_Walker Keith ARMISTEAD _|
| (1783 - 1845) m 1814 |
| | _John BAYLOR _________________+
| | | (1705 - 1772) m 1743
| |_Lucinda "Lucy" BAYLOR ____|
| (1745 - ....) m 1764 |
| |_Mary or Frances WALKER ______+
| (1724 - 1783) m 1743
|
|--Lewis Addison ARMISTEAD C.S.A.
| (1817 - 1863)
| ______________________________
| |
| ___________________________|
| | |
| | |______________________________
| |
|_Elizabeth STANLEY ______|
(.... - 1861) m 1814 |
| ______________________________
| |
|___________________________|
|
|______________________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: SANCHEZ SANCHA de CASTILE of Gascony |
_BORRELL II Count of Barcelona______+
| (0946 - 0992) m 0968
_RAIMUND Borrel I BORRELL Count of Barcelona_|
| (0972 - 1018) m 0992 |
| |_LUITGARDE de TOULOUSE _____________+
| (0952 - 0977) m 0968
_RAYMOND I "The Crooked" Berengar BORRELL Count of Barcelona_|
| (1005 - 1035) m 1021 |
| | _ROGER I CARCASSONNE of Carcassonne_
| | | (0935 - 1012)
| |_ERMENSINDE de CARCASSONNE __________________|
| (0975 - 1058) m 0992 |
| |_ADELAIDE de PONS __________________
| (0942 - 1011)
|
|--RAYMOND II "The Elder" Berengar BORRELL Count of Barcelona
| (1023 - 1076)
| _GARCIA I, Cde de CASTILE __________
| |
| _SANCHO de Castile, Cde de CASTILE __________|
| | (0965 - 1017) m 0994 |
| | |_AVA de RIBORGAZA of Castile________
| |
|_SANCHEZ SANCHA de CASTILE of Gascony________________________|
(1006 - 1026) m 1021 |
| _SALVADOR PEREZ, Cde de CASTILE ____+
| | (0964 - ....)
|_URRACA Salvadorez de CASTILE of Castile_____|
(0980 - 1025) m 0994 |
|____________________________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Margaret SHELMAN |
He and his bride, Eugenia (Haralson), moved to Austin, Texas,
the following year, and Flournoy opened a law practice there.
After Eugenia died, Flournoy married Virginia L. Holman in 1858.
He was attorney general for the state of Texas in 1860 and a
delegate to the 1860 Democratic nominating convention in
Galveston. At a mass meeting in Austin on September 22, 1860, he
asked the audience, "What will you do if Lincoln is elected?
That, I know, is what you want to hear about. I say, secede from
the Union." With Oran M. Roberts, Guy M. Bryan, W. S. Oldham,
and John Marshall, Flournoy helped call a Secession Convention
at Austin on December 3. He sat as a delegate to the convention
from January 28 through February 4, 1861, and served as a
coauthor of the declaration of causes for secession. He resigned
the following year to organize the Sixteenth Texas Infantry
regiment of Walker's Texas Division. He served as the colonel of
the regiment throughout the war. After the fall of the
Confederate government he fled to Mexico, where he served for a
while with Maximilian's forces. After his return to Texas,
Flournoy practiced law at Galveston for a few years. He was a
member of the Constitutional Convention of 1875 and moved to
California the following year. He died in San Francisco on
September 18, 1889.
Source: The New Texas Handbook
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_Marcus A. FLOURNOY _|
| (1800 - ....) |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--George M. FLOURNOY C.S.A.
| (1832 - 1889)
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_Margaret SHELMAN ___|
(1800 - ....) |
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Margaret Susannah RUCKER |
Sarah (Wife) Marriage: BEF. 1843 (Sallie Roeves?)
Children:
Rebecca J. Harrison b. 1843 in Tennesse
Thomas Daniel Harrison b. 1846 in Tennesse
_____________________
|
_____________________|
| |
| |_____________________
|
_Daniel Reese HARRISON ____|
| (1774 - 1850) |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| |_____________________
|
|
|--Nathaniel HARRISON
| (1807 - ....)
| _Thomas RUCKER ______+
| | (1683 - 1763) m 1710
| _George RUCKER Sr.___|
| | (1729 - 1815) m 1780|
| | |_Elizabeth REYNOLDS _+
| | (1690 - 1788) m 1710
|_Margaret Susannah RUCKER _|
(1785 - ....) |
| _Michael EHART ______
| | (1740 - 1794)
|_Catherine EHART ____|
(1760 - 1835) m 1780|
|_Katherine___________
(1740 - ....)
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: Mary Atlanta SADLER |
_Henry Hugh HYBART _____
| (1790 - ....)
_William Lewis HYBART C.S.A._|
| (1823 - 1892) m 1856 |
| |_Charity BETHEA ________+
| (1792 - 1859)
_Samuel Cummings HYBART _|
| (1861 - 1939) m 1892 |
| | _Thomas A. MCCANTS _____+
| | | (1808 - 1875) m 1833
| |_Mellison Amrintha MCCANTS __|
| (1834 - 1870) m 1856 |
| |_Margaret Jane BURGESS _+
| (1812 - 1845) m 1833
|
|--William Lewis HYBART
| (1895 - ....)
| ________________________
| |
| _____________________________|
| | |
| | |________________________
| |
|_Mary Atlanta SADLER ____|
(1857 - 1906) m 1892 |
| ________________________
| |
|_____________________________|
|
|________________________
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
Mother: ISABEL de CLARE of Pembroke |
________________________________________________________
|
_JOHN FitzGilbert "The Marshall" MARSHALL of Pembroke_|
| (1105 - 1165) |
| |________________________________________________________
|
_WILLIAM "The Protector" MARSHALL 3rd Earl of Pembroke_|
| (1144 - 1219) m 1189 |
| | _WALTER FitzEdward d' Evereux de SALISBURY of Salisbury_+
| | | (1100 - 1147)
| |_SYBIL de SALISBURY __________________________________|
| (1127 - ....) |
| |_SYBIL de CHAWORTH _____________________________________+
| (1097 - 1147)
|
|--SIBYL MARSHALL
| (1204 - 1245)
| _GILBERT de CLARE 1st Earl of Pembroke__________________+
| | (1100 - 1147)
| _RICHARD fitzGilbert "Strongbow" de CLARE of Leinster_|
| | (1130 - 1176) m 1171 |
| | |_ISABEL de BEAUMONT of Leicester________________________+
| | (1100 - ....)
|_ISABEL de CLARE of Pembroke___________________________|
(1174 - 1220) m 1189 |
| _DERMOT macDonnchada MACMURRAGH of Leinster_____________+
| | (1110 - 1171)
|_AIFE (Eva) MACMURRAGH of Leinster____________________|
(1143 - 1186) m 1171 |
|_Mor Ingen Muirchertaig O'TOOLE of Leinster_____________+
(1114 - 1164)
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
|
[408310]
Alt: 1783
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_(RESEARCH QUERY) McCULLOCH MCCULLOUGH _|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Mary Elizabeth "Betty" MCCULLOUGH
| (1718 - 1751)
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|________________________________________|
|
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.
|
Back to My Southern Family Home Page
HTML created by GED2HTML v3.6-WIN95 (Jan 18 2000) on 05/29/2005 09:03:10 PM Central Standard Time.