(Abt 1448-After 1512)
He [Walter Devereux] married, 2ndly, Jane. He was slain at the battle of Bosworth, 22 August 1485, and was attainted of high treason in the Parliament which met 7 November 1485, and was adjudged to have forfeited all that he possessed on the preceding 21 August, whether held in fee simple, fee tail, or for life. His widow married, 2ndly, Thomas VAUGHAN, who was living 18 November 1492. She married 3rdly Sir Edward BLOUNT, of Sodington, co. Worcester, who died s.p. 6 July 1499, and was buried in Mamble Church, co. Worcester. She married, 4thly, before 31 May 1507, Thomas POYNTZ: both were living 9 November 1512. [Complete Peerage V:321-5, (transcribed by Dave Utzinger)]
Jane married Walter Devereux Baron Ferrers Of Chartley, son of Sir Walter Devereux Knight and Elizabeth Merbury Heiress Of Weobley, after 1469.1 (Walter Devereux Baron Ferrers Of Chartley was born about 1432 in Weobley, , Herefordshire, England 3 4 5 and died on 23 Aug 1485 in Bosworth Field, Leicestershire, England 3 4 5.)
1st Husband 2ND Wife
1 Complete Peerage of England Scotland Ireland Great Britain and the United Kingdom, by G. E Cokayne, Sutton Publishing Ltd, 2000, V:324-5.
2 Other Researchers.
3 Ancestral Roots of Certain American Colonists, 7th Edition, by Frederick Lewis Weis, additions by Walter Lee Shippard Jr., 1999, 56b-37.
4 Newsgroup: soc.genealogy.medieval, at groups - google.com, Richard Borthwick, 5 Jul 1999.
5 Complete Peerage of England Scotland Ireland Great Britain and the United Kingdom, by G. E Cokayne, Sutton Publishing Ltd, 2000, V:321-5.
Brian Yap (葉文意)
This data in a Gencircles Page. See connections to other people's data. This database on the roots web server.
I do not update this one as oftem ,but it is good for producting reports of ancestors and descendents.
I am now working on a new project at wikicities. Please come and vist and add your info. There are other people in this site, for various reasons, some not related at all. Some are married into my family, some I once thought were related and, turns out, they are not.