| Introduction:
This historical sketch about Chittenden County, Vermont has been transcribed,
with little editing, from the 1871 source identified below. It presents
a glimpse into the county's history from it's earliest days through 1871
. . .
Source: The
Vermont Historical Gazetteer: A Magazine Embracing a History of Each
Town, Civil, Ecclesiastical, Biographical and Military. Vol.
I. Abby Maria Hemenway. (Editor). "Chittenden County,"
Hon. David Read. (Author). Burlington, Vt. : Miss Abby
Maria Hemenway, 1871. |

The county of Chittenden was incorporated
by act of the legislature of Vermont, Oct. 22, 1787. It is
bounded on the north by the counties of Grand Isle, Franklin, and
Lamoille; south by the county of Addison; east by Lamoille and Wasington;
and west by the west line of the state, and the southerly part of the
county of Grand Isle. In all our local histories, so far as noticed,
the county is eroneously said to be bounded "on the west by Lake
Champlain." By statute [see Revised Statutes of Vermont, 1839],
the western boundary includes "so much of Lake Champlain as lies
in this state west of the towns in said county adjoining the lake,
and not included within the limits of Grand Isle." The border towns,
by their charters, were bounded "on the west by the lake;" and it
seems that the legislature did not consider that they extended, by
legal construction, to the west line of the state--which passes along
its main or deepest channel.
The county is situated between 44º,
7', and 44º, 42' of north latitude: and between 3º,
41', and 4º, 14' of longitude east from Washington. It
has upon every side an irregular outline, formed by town lines on
the north, south, and east: with an average length from north to
south of about 26 miles, and from east to west, including the waters
of the lake, of 23 miles--and contains a land area of about 520 square
miles.
A branch of the Abenaquis tribe of
Indians, were the aboriginal occupants of this section of the country,
previous to its settlement by the pioneers; and, indeed, they lingered
upon their rightful soil, at the mouth of the Lamoille river and
thence north along the Missisquoi bay, for a long while after the French
and English had taken possession and commenced the settlement of
the country to the north and south of them. They have not as
yet wholly relinquished their claims upon the country; and although
they left it united themselves with the St. Francis tribe, another
branch of the Abenaquis, who reside at the outlet of the St. Francis
river on the St. Lawrence, they still claim an interest in the soil, and
have repeatedly, and within a few years past, sent their delegates
tot he legislature of Vermont, to seek some compensation for their
lands. [1.]
What time they left and joined their friends at St. Franics, is not
fully known. After the settlement of the country, an Indian
encampment and burial place were well distinguished near the mouth
of the Lamoille river, together with a mound of large size, where the
skeletons and bones of the race, buried in their usual sitting posture,
were exhumed, and numberous arrow heads and other Indian relics found.
And near this same place in Colchester, the remarkable urn or relic
of Indian pottery, described by Prof. Thompson, and now in the cabinet
of natural history in the University of Vermont, was also found [Thompson's
History of Vermont]. If, however, the Abenaquis made that
specimen of pottery, constructed in such perfect form, and so highly
ornamented upon its exterior surface, there was a time when they far
excelled in that useful art. The fact that this relic was found in
the vicinity, affords no very certain evidence that it was the work
of that race; but there is strong reason to believe that it must
have been the work of a people far more advanced in the useful arts.
It appears that the Abenaquis claimed
the country along Missisquoi bay, and sought to disturb the possession
of the whites, as late as 1788. By the kindness of Henry Stevens,
Esq., we have been furnished with a correspondence between Ira Allen,
who then resided at Cochester, and Clement Gorselin of Pointe au Roche,
Lord Dorchester, governor of the province of Quebec, and Lt. Col. John
Campbell, "of his majesty's service," respecting the proceedings
of these Indians, at so recent a date--being even after the county
of Chittenden was incorporated; and the settlement in question was
then within its limits.
Gorselin, under date of Aug. 18th,
1786, writes to Allen to inform him that the Indians claimed the
land on Missisquoi bay, and threatened to drive off the people, who
had settled there, and destroy their possessions. Allen replies,
Aug. 23d, 1786, that the French and Indians lost their claim in the
French war, and the lands had been granted tot he proprietors in
1763; that the Indians can have justice by applying to the courts in Vermont.
Moreover, that the governor of the state had appointed Col. Eben.
Allen of Grand Isle, to remove all unlawful intruders on the frontier,
with a military force.
Allen procures the deposition of John
Waggoner and Wm. Tichout, "June 21, 1788, before Thos. Butterfield, justice
of peace for the county of Chittenden," wherein they state among
other things, that an Indian named Capt. Louis of the St. Francis
tribe, with about twenty men, came on to the Missisquoi river last October,
"and hoisted a flag on a pole, drew their knives, threatened several of
the inhabitants in a hostile manner, obliged the inhabitants to provide
a dinner for them, claimed a right to the land, and took in a hostile
manner 10 bushels of Indian corn from Waggoner, and about 15 bushels
of potatoes from Tichout. The Indians also burnt and destroyed
some fences; that in April last, the same Indians threatened to dispossess
the subscriber John Waggoner, unless he would pay them one-quarter
of all he raised on said land, as rent to them."
Allen enclosed the above deposition
to Lord orchester, July 16th, 1788, and writes him the account
of a similar occurence about four years previous, when, he
says, "the settlers were so exasperated as to be about to drive out the
Indians by force, but had forborne on his request;" and asked
the governor to take measures to prevent any further difficulty.
And on the 7th of August, 1788, Allen also writes to Col. Campbell
on the same subject, remarking: "If the Indians would behave he
had no objection to their hunting and fishing on the land."
Col. Campbell thereupon addresses a
letter to Sir John Johnson, "Bart., Supt. and Inspector GEneral of
Indian Affairs," dated, Montreal, September 5th, 1788, in which he
says, "that he had called the Indians before him, and they confessed they
had been on Missisquoi bay; and always travel with their colors and display
them at their encampment, wherever they happen to be, as a mark of
their attachment to their Great Father the King of England.
Though they had the mortification to find Waggoner, Tichout, and
others, on their lands, yet they neither drew knives or committed
any irregularities; confident that their father would do them justice
therein." That "they were but 9 men, a boy, 11 women, and 8 children
on the breast, in number;" and that the Indians appealed to John
Hilliker, neighbor to Waggoner and Tichout, who was their interpreter,
to prove what they had said. Lord Dorchester, October 11th,
1788, transmitted a copy of the above letter to Ira Allen, for his
examination. Capt. Louis was styled the Abenaqui chief, in the foregoing
correspondence.
With the preceding there is a lease
before us, from the papers of Mr. Stevens, executed in 1765, by a
number of these Indians, which establishes the fact beyond question,
that they were a branch of the Abenaquis tribe, or as they styled
themselves, "the Abenackque nation of Missisque;" who occupied, and, to
some extent, cultivated the lands, at that time, on the Missisquoi
bay and river. As the lease is of historical interest, it is
here given at length, except the formal repetitions in it:
"Know
all men by these presents, that we Daniel Poorneuf, Francois Abernard,
Francois Joseph, Jean Baptiste, Jeanoses, Charlotte, widow of the late
chief of the Abenackque nation at Missisque, Mariane Poorneuf, Theresa,
daughter of Joseph Madril, Magdalaine Abernard, and Joseph Abomsawin,
for themselves, their heirs, and assigns; do sell, let, and concede
unto Mr. James Robertson, merchant, of St. Jean, his heirs, and assigns,
for the space of ninety-one years from the twenty-eighth of May 1765,
a certain tract of land lying and being and situated as follows,
viz: being in the bay of Missisque on a certain point of land, which
runs out into said bay and the river of Missisque, running from the
mouth up said river near east, one league and a half, and in depth
north and south, running from each side of the river, sixty arpents,
bounded on the back of the aforesaid bay and at the end of the said
league and a half to lands belonging to the Indians joining to a tree
marked; on the south side of the river said land belonging to old Abernard;
and on the north side of said river to lands belonging to old Whitehead,
retaining and reserving to the proprietors hereafter mentioned, to
wit: on the north side of said river five farms belonging to Peirre
Peckinowax, Francaise Nickowiget, Annus Jean, Baptiste Momlock, and
Joseph Compient; and on the south side of said river seven farms
belonging to Towgesheat, Cecile, Annome Quisse, Innongaway, Willsomquax,
Jean Baptiste the Whitehead, and old Etienne, for them and their
heirs, said farms contain two arpents in front nearly, and sixty in depth.
"Now
the condition of said lease is, that if the aforesaid James Robertson,
himself, his heirs, and assigns, do pay * * * * a yearly rent of fourteen
Spanish dollars, two bushells of Indian corn, and one gallon of rum,
and to plow as much land for each of the above persons as shall be
sufficient for them to plant their Indian corn every year, not exceeding
more than will serve to plant one quarter of a bushell for each family,
to them and their heirs and assigns: * * * * said Robertson to have
the right to build thereon, and establish the same for his own use,
and to concede to inhabitants, make plantations, cut timber of what
sort or kind he shall think proper; * * * * In witness whereof, we have
interchangably set our hands and seals hereunto, this thirteenth day of
June, inthe fifth year of the reign of our sovereign lord, George
the Third, king of Great Britain, France and Ireland, and in the
year of our Lord 1765.
| DANIEL POORNEUF, |
[L.S.] |
| FRANCOISE
JOSEPH, |
[L.S.] |
| JEANOSES, |
[L.S.] |
| MARIANE POORNEUF, |
[L.S.] |
| MAGDELANE
ABERNARD, |
[L.S.] |
| FRANCOISE
ABERNARD, |
[L.S.] |
| JEAN BAPT--, |
[L.S.] |
| CHARLOLLE
, |
[L.S.] |
| THERESA, Daughter
of Michel, |
[L.S.] |
| JAMES ROBERTSON, |
[L.S.] |
|
|
| Witnesses
present: |
|
|
EDWARD SIMONDS, |
|
|
PETER STANLEY, |
|
|
RICARD McCARTY. |
|
The lease was properly autenticated,
and "recorded in the English register, letter A, folio 179, in the register's
office of enrollments for the province of Quebec. George Powell,
secry's regis't.
At the given date there was a Jesuit
mission and church among these Indians, who from their names were
evidently baptised or christianized; and they continued here up to
the time of the Revolution, and some of them later.
It is evident that the French, before
the conquest of Canada, were the first civilized occupants of the
county of Chittenden; and during the period of the French wars, they
and their Indian allies, made this point one of the chief rendezvous
of their hostile excursions against the English settlements, in the
valley of the Connecticut. It was through here they generally led
their captives and carried their plunder--their usual route both
in going and returning was along Missisquoi bay and Winooski river;
crossing the short carrying place between the river and Mallet's
by. It was along here the suffering captives from Deerfield, in the
dead of winter in 1704, were led on their way to Canada--where the lad
Enos Stevens, son of Capt. Phineas Stevens the brave defender of
Charlestown No. 4, and father of Henry Stevens, Esq., our distinguished
antiquarian neighbor--was carried captive into Canada in 1748; and
on the east shore of Missisquoi bay the year previous, where Mrs.
Jemima Howe, whose narrative is of school-boy notoriety, found her
young son Caleb, perishing with hunger. In 1709, moreover, a skirmish
took place on Onion river between a party sent out from Mass. to watch
the movements of the enemy, and a party of French and Indians, in
which Lieut. John Wells and John Burt were killed; their surviving
associates, however, drove the enemy and pursued them to the lake,
where another skirmish ensued, and several of the French and Indians
were killed in turn [Hoyt's Indian Wars and Hall's History of
Eastern Vermont]. These, with other incidents of a like kind,
when brought to mind, serve to contrast the present populous and
highly cultivated condition of our county, with the dark and savage
wilderness that then brooded over it.

The first English occupants, who were
known to settle in the locality, were Ira Allen and Remember Baker.
They explored the country along the Winooski river, int he fall of
1772; and came into the county to reside the spring following.
Baker brought his family with him; and Allen, being then a single man,
resided in the family of Baker--who was his uncle. They made
their pitch at the lower falls, on the Winooski river; where, as
a matter of security against the Yorkers and Indians, who at that
time they held in equal enmity, they constructed a block house or fort,
which they christened with the defiant name of Fort Frederick, and in which
they lived.
About the same time, two Germans settled
on Shelburne point, claiming under New York titles : "who" says Allen,
"had the appearance of peaceable men, and on their promise to behave,
were suffered to remain undisturbed." Prof. Thompson speaks
of these men, in his History of Vermont, by the name of Logan and
Pottier; and that "two points of land extending into Lake Champlain" were
named after them respectively. We have before us the original
field book of Ira Allen, of his first surveys on Onion river, and
the lake shore, in 1773--being the same yar he removed into the country.
He scaled the lake shore that summer, from the mouth of the Winooski
river to the mouth of the La Plotte, at the head of Shelburne bay;
and in the course of his observations he calls Shelburne point Arkley point,
and a house then there Lodawick's house.
On reaching the point now known as
rock point, he there takes observations to the islands, &c.,
and says: "to Arkley point is S. 15º W.--to Shugar loaf (Rock
Dunder?) is S. 24º W.--to Juniper island is S. 36º W."
He then passes along on the beach "E. 29º S. 105 rods to station
B.--to Arkley's point is S. 21º W.--to Shugar loaf is S. 30º
W., to Juniper island, east end, is S. 42º W.--to the Four Brothers,
is W. 37º S." When he had passed Burlington bay and came
to Red Rock point, he speaks of it as "east of Arkley point and had
a rocky bold shore." After sailing around it, and passing along
the beach he made another station 27, 30 chains south of a brook (Louis
creek?), and from there, he says : "to Arkley point, is N. 36º
41' W.--to Lodawick's house is N. 77º 30' W.--Shurgar
loaf and Juniper island are just to be seen by Arkley point."
He then passes on, and took several more observations to the house
on the point, until he arrived at the mouth of La Plotte river, where he
terminated his survey.
If Logan and Pottier were the only
persons on Shelburne point at that time, it is not easy to see how
Ira Allen came by the names, "Arkley point," and Lodawick's house."
The north end of Shelburne point is known by the name of Pottier's point,
and where, it is said, Pottier lived. Logan lived on a small point
just north of Judge Mench's old place; and this point still bears
his name; but it could not be seen by Allen in making the above survey.

At the commencement of the Revolution,
about forty families had settled upon the lake shore, and along the
Winooski river, including the family of Mr. Brown on Brown's river
in Jericho. Among those early settlers are the familiar names
of Thomas Pierson, Moses Pierson, Simon Tubbs, John Collins, Stephen
Lawrence, Frederick Saxton, Ira Allen, Remember Baker, Joseph Brown, Thomas
Rood, Samuel Messenger, Thomas Chittenden, John Chamberlin, Jonathan
Spafford, and Amos Brownson. But on the defeat and fall of Gen. Montgomery
at Quebec, and the retreat of the American forces under Gen. Sullivan,
from Canada, in the spring of 1776, all except Brown left their possessions
and fled south among their friends for security. The wisdom
of this abandonment of the settlement, during hostilities with mother
country, was made manifest by the fate of Brown and his family; who,
trusting to his fancied security in the seclusion of his position--so
far from the lake and the ordinary path of the enemy--was taken by a
party of Indians, and carried into captivity. It is not certin, however,
that the settlement would have been abandoned, had not the troops,
who were stationed on Onion river for the protection of the inhabitants,
left their post, and exposed them to the depredations of the enemy,
without any means of defence. These troops were stationed at
a block house in Jericho, on the river in the south west part of the
town, and were under the command of Capt. Fassett, then holding a commission,
and acting under the orders of Gen. Gates; who had his head quarters at
Ticonderoga. Matthew Lyon (afterwards known as the "Lyon of Vermont")
held a lieutenant's command in the company, and it was said that
he and the other subordinate officers of the company, in view of
their exposed and dangerous position, induced the soldiers to desert
it; which, however, Lyon always denied, casting the blame on Fassett
and the other officers. Lyon went to Gates to make report that
the soldiers had all left; whereupon he with the other officers were
arrested, tried by a court martial, and cashiered for cowardice.
When Lyon was afterwards in congress from this state, he was insulted
by Roger Griswold of Conn., for wearing a wooden sword; which induced
the personal affray on the floor of congress between those gentlemen,
that occurred in 1798; and resulted in a vote for the expulsion of
Lyon; but failing of a majority of two thirds, he retained his seat.
On the return of peace in 1783, Stephen
Lawrence was the first to return with his family, and during the
same year most of the former occupants returned to their farms, and
brought with them many new settlers; and the very great fertility of the
soil, possessing all its native richness and strength, invited a rapid
settlement of the country. At the end of eight years after
the close of the Revolution (1791), the population within the present
limits of the county of Chittenden, was 3,875; and in 1800, it was 9,395;
more than one-third of the present population of the county--it being
in 1860, 28,171. It will be seen, however, that the ratable property
of the county has increased in a much greater ratio, than the population;
for we find on the first census, 1791, that the amount of ratable
property returned was estimated in the aggregate, at $50,675.72,
about $13 to each person--man, woman, and child; while on the last
census, 1860, the ratable property is estimated at the sum of $7,845,941,
which is $278 to the person.
It may also be noticed with interest,
that the number of persons to each square mile in the county, in
1791, was 7 1/2; and in 1860, 54 1/5. That the ratable wealth
to each square mile in 1791, was $97.45; and in 1860, $13,165.21.
In 1791, Windsor was the most populous town in the state, containing
801 inhabitants--now Burlington is the most populous, and contains
7,713 inhabitants; moreover, in 1791, Vermont was a slave-holding
state; having returned 16 slaves on that census; but it was the last
and only census that testified to the humiliating fact, that a resident
slave treads upon the soil of Vermont.
From the above figures we may plainly
see how limited were the means of our fathers, and how severe must
have been their toil, to open the country and make a beginning for
the wealth and comfort of their children. But it should not be
forgotten that they had a higher object than mere wealth and comfortable
support; they looked forward to the more important advantages of
social progress and political freedom; which have thus far been more
than realized. But the result of the events that are now passing
before us, must determine how much longer these highest of earthly
blessings can be enjoyed.
TO PART TWO

|