| |
BACKGROUND TO THE 1838 PEOPLE'S REBELLION AND THE FULL STORY OF THE EXCITING RIOTS
IN TODMORDEN
|
|
The
following article contains extracts of the minutes of various meetings
of the Todmorden & Walsden Overseers of the Poor, taken from
a transcription of notes made circa 1894 by James Whitehead. These
notes were transcribed by Betty Savage, March 1980, and we are greatly
indebted to her. |
|
BACKGROUND AND BORING BITS
In
1834 the Poor Law Amendment Act was made, requiring all townships
to merge with neighbouring towns to form a larger group, to be known
as a Union. This was the first real attempt to reform the old Poor
Law Act, which had been in existence since 1601.
The
1834 Act required Todmorden & Walsden to join with Stansfield,
Langfield, Heptonstall, Wadsworth, and Erringden to form the Todmorden
Union. The Union was to be run by a Board of Guardians who would
organise the erection of a large workhouse. All applicants for financial
relief would be sent automatically to the workhouse and "out
relief" would be discontinued. The Government saw this as a
way of discouraging claims on the basis that the workhouses would
be less than basic and very austere places to live.
In
1837 the Todmorden Union was formed and the first meeting of the
Board of Guardians was held at the Golden Lion in Todmorden on 15th
February. Mr. John Crossley of Scaitcliffe chaired the meeting and
James Stansfield was elected as clerk and superintendent registrar,
posts he held until his death in 1874. At the meeting, the representatives
from Todmorden & Walsden and Langfield refused to comply with
the law and refused to elect members to the Board of Guardians.
They said they would have nothing to do with the Union and would
continue to administer their own "out relief" as they
had always done. They determined they would continue to raise taxes
from the folk of Todmorden & Walsden and Langfield, and would
look after their own poor.
The
ordinary townsfolk disliked the interference from the Government.
The new Union workhouses were regarded as prisons and the treatment
of the poor was regarded as harsh and degrading. A group of people
opposed to the new laws got together under the name of the Todmorden
Working Men's Association and declared its intention to fight for
a repeal of the Act. They held public meetings and organised demonstrations
and boycotts of shops and businesses belonging to those known to
support the law.
The
Overseers of Todmorden and Walsden were determined not to comply
with the orders of the new Poor Law Commissioners, and issued a
notice to all Ratepayers of the township:
Notice
to the Ratepayers of Todmorden and Walsden
The
Overseers of the above township, having made no return of Guardians
under the new Poor Law, particularly desire the ratepayers to
meet them in the Old Church Todmorden on Monday next the 2nd day
of April at 2 o'clock in the afternoon for the purpose of expressing
their approbation or disapprobation of the Overseers' proceedings.
Also
for the purpose of considering and fixing upon proper persons
and methods for making out a Poor Rate as directed by the new
Parochial Assessment Act or otherwise, and for any other business
relating to the affairs of the township.
Todmorden
30th March 1838
William
Crossley
William
Robinson
John
Shackleton
(Overseers)
Todmorden
2nd April 1838
At
a meeting held this day pursuant to the foregoing notice, Mr. William
Robinson in the chair. It was resolved:
First:
That this meeting approves of the conduct of the overseers of this
Township in not making any returns of Guardians under the new Poor
Law Assessment Act, and the Ratepayers hereby undertake to indemnify
the said Overseers in any proceedings which may be taken against
them for such conduct.
Second:
That this meeting approves of and hereby confirms the determination
come to by a meeting of ratepayers and other inhabitants of this
township held on 15th February 1837 when the following were unanimously
adopted:
That this meeting views with alarm the attempt now making by the
Commissioners under the Poor Law Amendment Act to introduce a
change in the management of the affairs of this township, destruction
of that self-government that we have had handed down to us by
our forefathers, and which we feel it to be our duty as well as
our interest to maintain.
That the Poor Law Amendment Act is, at least in one of its parts,
an unconstitutional and coercive measure. This, we find from reports
of the debates, was declared over and over again by many distinguished
lawyers during the discussions on it when it was passing through
the House of Commons. Amongst that number are Sir J. Scarlett,
now Lord Abingdon, since made a Judge of the land, Mr. Godson,
Mr. Jarvis, and a long list of men learned in the law.
That we have committed no breach of the law in this township;
that we have had no riots nor disturbance amongst us; that we
have pursued our daily avocations in peace and quietness; that
we have paid all demands on us, public and parochial; that we
are willing to continue to do so, if we may be allowed without
sacrificing our rights and liberties, but if we be required to
surrender these and to live under a despotism consisting of three
Commissioners to whom we owe no allegiance and whose rules, regulations
and orders, if obeyed, would take the control of our Parish affairs
out of our own hands, that if we be required to do this, then
we say resistance to such an attempt is not only a virtue but
a duty and to shrink from such resistance would be a crime.
That we are well satisfied with the management of our own affairs
in this township and that we pledge ourselves individually and
collectively to resist any foreign interference with the management
thereof; and we are resolved that we will not be united to any
other township in the manner proposed by the projected Union of
the Poor Law Commissioners.
That we will make no return of Guardians to constitute any machinery
for such a purpose; that we will pay no rates to any Overseer
acting for any Union if one should, in opposition to our wishes,
be formed; and that we will indemnify our Church Wardens and Overseers
from any penalties inflicted on them, for acting in obedience
to our instructions in opposing the introduction of the Poor Law
Amendment Act in this township.
That although we are resolved to make this stand for the maintenance
our rights and liberties against the attempt now making by the
Poor Law Commissioners to wrest from us the control we have hitherto
exercised in relieving our own poor; to place those poor, whom
we love and respect and who have been guilty of no crime, in a
Workhouse and under a discipline and restraint more intolerable
than is allotted to felons in a gaol; yet we feel it is to be
our duty and our highest pleasure to acknowledge the Constitution
of King, Lords and Commons and to obey any laws directly emanating
from them.
Third:
That a committee be appointed to make out a new assessment for this
township in the manner directed by the new Parochial Assessment
Act; that the following persons, together with the Overseers and
Church Wardens do constitute such a committee of whom any five with
a majority of the Overseers and Church Wardens shall form a quorum: |
|
John
Crossley esq. of Scaitcliffe |
John
Barker of Barewise Mill |
John
Fielden esq. M.P. of Dawson Weir |
John
Buckley of Todmorden |
James
Taylor esq. of Todmorden Hall |
Thomas
Ramsbottom of Centre Vale |
Thomas
Bottomley of Spring Mill |
John
Haigh of Pastureside |
William
Greenwood of Watty Place |
Robert
Law of Ramsden Clough |
John
Stansfield of Ewood |
John
Fielden of Clough Mill |
Joshua
Fielden of Waterside |
William
Helliwell of Friths Mill |
John
Barker of Edge End |
Charles
Chambers of Todmorden |
William
Scholfield of Todmorden |
William
Greenwood, grocer of Todmorden |
John
Ratcliffe of Woodfield |
Jonathan
Uttley of Todmorden Edge |
Abraham
Ormerod of Gorpley Mill |
Reuben
Haigh of Moorcock |
Abraham
Scholfield of Knowl Top |
John
Marland jnr. of Walsden |
John
Stansfield of Moorhey |
James
Howarth of Royal George, Todmorden |
|
|
John
Fielden, Member of Parliament and Todmorden mill owner, wrote a
letter to the Guardian newspaper:
July
2nd 1838
".......the
object is to stop outdoor relief to the able bodied, and that the
strict workhouse principle requires that all members of a family
claiming relief should enter the workhouse and give up their property
for the benefit of the Parish. To enter a workhouse the family must
submit to workhouse discipline. Each individual must put on workhouse
dress, and the husband must be separated from his wife, both from
their children, and the female children separated from the male
children.."
John
Fielden 1784-1849
The
Poor Law Commissioners responded to this opposition by taking steps
to take over the administration on 6th. July 1838. John Fielden
immediately threatened to close all his several mills on that day,
which would put his 3000 employees and their dependants into the
position of having to claim relief, thereby severely clogging up
the system. The Commissioners called his bluff, and John Fielden
was obliged to re-open his mills 10 days later.
The
incomplete Board of Guardians arranged its first meeting for July
6th 1838, the date the Poor Law Commissioners were to take over
the administration. John Fielden and many other notables of the
time showed their objections to the Union by staging a demonstration
at the same time and outside the place where the Board planned to
meet. The Board held an emergency meeting the previous evening at
the White Hart when it was resolved :
"...in
consequence of the very large concourse of persons likely to assemble
tomorrow at the anti-poor law meeting to be held near Woodmill,
and threats of violence uttered by persons, that the meeting not
be held. The Guardians are willing to bring the law into operation
if they can receive adequate protection, civil and military; and
request further information from the Poor Law Board on the subject."
Local
Magistrates drafted in Cavalry and Special Constables to restore
order. Resistance to the law continued throughout the year and a
troop of Infantry was stationed permanently in the town to restrict
the intimidation and boycotts.
The
Board of Guardians did eventually meet, and settled a tax rate from
the people of Todmorden & Walsden of £50 and from Langfield
£20. The Overseers of Todmorden & Walsden and Langfield
were instructed not to raise this money and not to comply with the
orders from the Board of Guardians. This is how they did it:
Notice
to the Ratepayers of the township of Todmorden and Walsden
An
order, of which the following is a copy, has been received by
the Overseers of the above township:
Todmorden
Union
To
the Overseers of the township of Todmorden and Walsden
You
are hereby authorised and directed to pay to Mr. Thomas E. Boyd,
manager of the Commercial Bank of England, Todmorden, on the 9th
day of August next, at the White Hart Inn, Todmorden the sum of
fifty pounds from the Poor Rates of the said township towards
the relief of the poor thereof, and towards defraying such proportion
of the general expenses of the Union as is lawfully chargeable
on the said township, and you shall take the receipt of the said
Thomas E. Boyd for the said sum of £50 given under our hands
at a meeting of the Guardians of the said Union, held on Friday
the 27th day of July 1838.
James
Taylor - Presiding Chairman
John
Foster jnr. - Guardian
John
Riley - Guardian.
In
consequence of receiving the above order from the Board of Guardians,
the Overseers request that the Ratepayers meet them in the Old
Church Todmorden on Saturday next the 4th day of August at 7 o'clock
in the evening precisely for the purpose of determining whether
the said order shall or shall not be complied with. The Overseers,
as the servants of the township, consider themselves bound to
act in accordance with the wishes of the majority of the Ratepayers
and they particularly desire that all the Ratepayers will attend.
Todmorden
July 3rd 1838
William
Crossley
William
Robinson
John
Shackleton
Overseers
Todmorden
4th August 1838
At
a meeting held pursuant to the above notice, it was resolved that
the Overseers be directed not to comply with the order of the Board
of Guardians referred to in the above notice and that the Ratepayers
now present do indemnify the Overseers for so doing.
William
Robinson, Chairman.
Signed
by the following Ratepayers: |
|
Thomas
Lord |
Abraham
Greenwood |
Barker
Greenwood |
James
Uttley |
John
Ratcliffe |
John
Crabtree |
John
Southwell |
John
Stansfield |
John
Whitehead |
Thomas
Dawson |
Robert
Sutcliffe |
William
Dawson |
James
Scholfield |
Robert
Law |
John
Barker |
John
Howarth |
Joseph
Brook |
Joshua
Fielden |
John
Sutcliffe |
Enoch
Fielden |
Samuel
Howarth |
William
Crowther |
William
Marshall |
Joshua
Cudworth |
John
Dawson |
James
Greenwood |
James
Greenwood |
David
Mitchell |
James
Mills |
James
Dawson |
John
Webster |
Philip
Crowther |
Stott
Sutcliffe |
John
Holt |
James
Barker |
William
Greenwood |
James
Lord |
John
Fielden |
John
Mills |
James
Stephenson |
Thomas
Greenwood |
William
Crowther |
James
Fielden |
John
Greenwood |
George
Taylor |
William
Greenwood |
James
Gibson |
James
Newell |
Jonathan
Uttley |
William
Haigh |
John
Marland jnr |
Daniel
Ogden |
John
Greenwood |
Joseph
Hurst |
Joshua
West |
John
Crowther |
William
Stansfield |
William
Helliwell |
Thomas
Fielden |
Ely
Greenwood |
James
Howarth |
Thomas
Sutcliffe |
William
Law |
Samuel
Fielden |
William
Chadwick |
Abraham
Mills |
Joseph
Stell |
Samuel
Crabtree |
Thomas
Unsworth |
Abraham
Barker |
Jabesh
Butterworth |
Stephen
Nuttall |
Samuel
Bentley |
Joseph
Eastwood |
Robert
Law |
Thomas
Hartley |
Ellis
Hollows |
Abraham
Taylor |
James
Jackson |
Henry
Helliwell |
Edmund
Farrow |
James
Horsfall |
William
Greenwood |
Thomas
Law |
John
Farrow |
Henry
Ramsbottom |
John
Greenwood |
John
Hindle |
William
Farrow |
James
Travis |
Abraham
Clegg |
John
Laycock |
William
Slater |
James
Farrow |
William
Scholfield |
Thomas
Holt |
John
Fielden |
William
Fielden |
John
Haigh |
Benjamin
Crowther |
Jeremiah
Howarth |
James
Howarth |
James
Sutcliffe |
Thomas
Beasley |
Thomas
Stansfield |
James
Horsfall |
James
Fletcher |
William
Southwell |
William
Stansfield |
John
Fielden |
Samuel
Fielden jnr. |
Zachariah
Heyworth |
James
Greenwood |
John
Webster |
James
Dawson |
Joseph
Hurst |
Ely
Crossley |
George
Davies |
James
Fielden |
Major
Rothwell |
William
Fielden |
Matthew
Wilson |
George
Widdup |
George
Cockcroft |
Abraham
Barker |
Gibson
Cockcroft |
Robert
Walmesley |
John
Ashworth |
John
Holt |
James
Brown |
William
Taylor |
Joseph
Knowles |
William
Normanton |
James
Cheetham |
Thomas
Wilson |
Samuel
Simpson |
James
Fielden |
William
Mitchell |
John
Orrell |
Benjamin
Watson |
Peter
Bentley |
William
Cunliffe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice
to the Ratepayers of Todmorden and Walsden
A
meeting of the Ratepayers of the above township will be held in
the Old Church Todmorden on Saturday next the 17th November at
6 o'clock in the evening precisely for the purpose of determining
and directing what measures shall be taken by the Overseer in
consequence of the fines which have been imposed on them by the
Magistrates for refusing to obey the orders of the Guardians for
the payment to their Treasurer of the several sums specified in
their warrant. And also for the Ratepayers to advise the Overseers
what course shall be taken with parties who refuse to pay their
rates. It is particularly requested that all Ratepayers shall
attend.
William
Crossley
William
Robinson
John
Shackleton
Todmorden
12th November 1838
Todmorden
November 17th 1838
At
a meeting of the Ratepayers held this day pursuant to the above
notice, it was resolved:
1.
That the Ratepayers of Todmorden and Walsden are thankful to the
Overseers for the perseverance and manhood with which they have
hitherto resisted the demands of the so-called Board of Guardians
of the Todmorden Union.
2.
That the undersigned Ratepayers, desirous of seeing the validity
of the Board stated, cordially approve of an appeal from the
convictions that have taken place to some tribunal in which
the test can be applied.
3.
That should it be the intention of the Overseers to appeal to
some higher court against the convictions obtained from the
Magistrates, we the undersigned ratepayers pledge ourselves
to support them with the necessary pecuniary means, and to pay
in proportion to the amount of our respective rates.
4.
That the Overseers be directed to summons all Ratepayers who
refuse to pay their rates before the Magistrates.
5.
That this book with the proceedings and resolutions of the meeting
as now entered be taken to every Ratepayer in the township for
the purpose of giving all who approve of them an opportunity
of signing.
William
Robinson, Chairman
Over
1000 signatures of Todmorden and Walden folk were collected. These
are transcribed and include names, occupations and addresses.
SEE THE FULL PETITION HERE |
|
|
So,
the Overseers of Todmorden & Walsden were supported by a vast
number of people of the township in their decision not to hand
over £50 to the Union and to continue to care for their
own poor as they had done successfully for centuries.
Likewise,
Mr. William Ingham, the Overseer of Langfield, was similarly supported.
He refused to hand over the £20 supposedly due from the
township of Langfield. He was summonsed to appear before the Magistrates
for this, and was personally fined £5. He refused to pay
the fine.
THIS ACT RESULTED IN RIOT AND MAYHEM THROUGHOUT TODMORDEN
EXCITING BITS |
|
|
The story is best told by reproducing the newspaper articles written at the time. |
|
|
THE LONDON TIMES
November 24th 1838
THE NEW POOR LAW – RIOTING AT TODMORDEN – THE MILITARY CALLED OUT
The attempts to enforce the introduction of the new Poor Law Bill into the manufacturing districts of Yorkshire continue to keep these districts in a state of excitement the most alarming….
.…On Friday the hitherto peaceful town of Todmorden was plunged into a scene of riot and disturbance of the most serious description, in consequence of the inhabitants, through their overseers, refusing to contribute their share towards the newly formed Poor Law Union.
From the accounts we have received from the latter place, it appears that some time since the overseers of Langfield, Todmorden, Walsden and Lee, were fined by the bench of Magistrates for refusing to pay a certain sum of money, which was proved to have been regularly demanded, in support of the Union of that district. The overseers would not pay, on the plea that they were utterly unable to collect one farthing, so strenuously opposed were the inhabitants to the new law. The Guardians of the Union, however, were determined to extract the money from the overseers, leaving it to the latter to seek their own remedy, and on Friday last warrants were issued by the Magistrates and placed in the hands of proper officers to distrain upon the goods and chattels of the said overseers. |
|
|
William Ingham's house in Mankinholes |
The first place chosen by the constables to levy was the house of Mr. William Ingham, the overseer of the township of Langfield near Todmorden, into which they entered, having brought with them a horse and cart to convey away the goods. |
|
|
No sooner did the people of Todmorden and neighbourhood hear of what was going on, than they congregated in great numbers in front of Mr. Ingham's house, threatening vengeance upon the two unfortunate limbs of the law engaged in the distraint.
They threatened to burn down the house of Mr. Ingham unless he turned out the two bailiffs and handed them over to the tender mercies of the mob. The cart which the unfortunate men had brought with them was broken to atoms, piled in a heap, and set fire to, and the harness cut to ribands.
|
|
|
Mr. Ingham from his house attempted to address the mob, begging them to spare the men’s lives, which, after considerable tumult, they consented to, providing that Mr. Ingham instantly turned them out |
William Ingham's house from the road |
|
|
Upon an assurance that the bailiffs should receive no bodily injury, Mr. Ingham turned them out. The mob immediately proceeded to strip them naked, and in that state they were suffered to depart, followed by the mob with hootings and horrid imprecations. At this moment, the Board of Guardians of the Union was holding a meeting at the Crown Inn at Woodmill. To this place the mob repaired and broke every window in the inn, the Guardians having to make their escape from the back of the premises in the best way they could. A meeting of Magistrates was immediately summoned when it was resolved to send for the military from Blackburn and Manchester. Detachments of infantry were soon upon the spot, but on their arrival the mob dispersed. The military are still in the town, but no further attempts at riot have been made. A Whig paper (The Manchester Guardian of Wednesday) gives the following account of the disturbances:
On the afternoon of Friday last the township of Langfield near Todmorden became the scene of a very gross outrage on the persons of two officers, sent from Halifax, to carry into effect a precept of the law on the property of an overseer. About 3 o’clock in the afternoon of the above day, two stout and respectably dressed persons were observed proceeding in a one-horse cart, with reins, in the direction from Halifax and towards Woodmill, about a mile and a quarter from Todmorden. On arriving at a turning in the road, they took the direction of Mankinholes, the residence of Mr. W. Ingham, assistant overseer for the township of Langfield, whose house they entered, leaving the horse and cart in the front yard.
They soon made known to Mr. Ingham that their business was to seize his household furniture, by authority of a distraint warrant for the penalty of £5 awarded by the Magistrates of Halifax, for neglecting to comply with an order of the Board of Guardians. Mr. Ingham still being unable or unwilling to pay, they proceeded to levy on his goods, when a handbell was heard to ring outside of the house. A number of people were very soon upon the spot, and their numbers quickly increased; the alarm spreading in every part of the valley and upon the hills where a number of men were at work for the Manchester and Leeds Railway Company; they flew from their employ, as well as the hands of four or five cotton mills and in a short time the house was surrounded by a multitude of many hundreds of persons of both sexes.
Meantime some person had turned the horse towards the main road and set it off; and one of the constables ventured out of the house to bring it back, which he succeeded in, after following it the greater part of a mile towards Todmorden. On approaching the house, which he seemed to have summoned a desperate resolution to effect, the cart was seized and thrown over in a minute, the horse falling between the shafts and the man beside it. He still retained his hold, when one person took up a stone and dashed it with force upon his breast. He recovered his feet, and fortunately made his escape to the house without receiving any serious injury. The gearing of the horse was then cut and it was turned into a field, whilst the cart was smashed and broken by picks, and afterwards it was set on fire and entirely consumed.
It had now become almost dark, and the situation of the two constables in the house assumed every moment an appearance of greater peril; they begged to be allowed to go away without personal harm. They represented to those with whom they could occasionally interchange expressions that it was an unpleasant duty forced upon them, and tendered their promise not to be again so employed, if suffered to return without harm in this instance. The mob would listen no parley: they at length demanded that the men should be turned out of the house; and, their request not being promptly complied with, stones were thrown, several windows were broken, and further violence was threatened, when at length the door was opened, and the unfortunate men walked into the crowd, which seemed ready to tear them to pieces.
They proceeded towards Woodmill, at which place, at the Crown Inn, the Guardians were sitting; but had not gone far, ere every vestige of apparel contributing to decency was torn from their backs, and they literally ran the gauntlet naked, except their stockings, through a continuous crowd, which hooted, pelted, and inflicted on them indignities which are not fit for description.
The mob now collected in front of the Public House, and one of the Guardians, Mr. Royston Oliver, endeavoured to address and reason with them, but his efforts were in vain, and it was not without difficulty that the crowd were prevented from laying hold of him, and dragging him out. The windows were, however, smashed, after which the mob slowly dispersed, and, on the arrival of the 8 o’clock coach for Halifax, the two constables (who had to a degree re-clothed) returned by it to that town. Nothing further had occurred on Monday. The constables, being strangers, could not name individual offenders, many of whom also are supposed to be strangers working on the railway.
THE LONDON TIMES 26TH NOVEMBER 1838
MORE RIOTING AT TODMORDEN
Thursday evening November 22nd. |
|
A further demonstration of the feeling with which the Poor Law is received in the village of Todmorden and its neighbourhood was manifested yesterday. A report had got into circulation that a posse of constables, supported by military, would in the afternoon seize the goods of Mr. Ingham, the overseer of Langfield, in execution of the process referred to in our report of that transaction on the Friday previous. |
|
|
|
A number of persons consequently assembled at the spot, and on the eminences commanding views of the scene of expected operations. The report proved to be incorrect, for neither constables nor military came in site. |
|
|
The crowd being, however, collected, and probably disappointed in not having something to do, turned their attention to other employment, and wheeled round to the premises of Messrs. Samuel and Royston Oliver at Wood Mills, the latter being a Guardian for the township of Langfield. These houses they broke into and sacked, breaking all the windows and doors, and making a wreck of the greater part of the furniture. |
|
|
The mob then proceeded rapidly through Todmorden and up to Dules, or Devil’s Gate (as the pass to Bacup is called), to Friths Mill, where they ransacked the house of Mr. William Helliwell, another of the Guardians, and broke his windows, doors and furniture in a similar manner. |
|
|
Mr. Helliwell was entertaining a party of friends, all of whom fled precipitately, and the house was entered and furniture broken as at the other places. Mrs. Helliwell begged them to spare a clock because it was her mother’s, but her entreaties were of no avail. This might be about half past five in the evening. |
William Helliwell's house and mill at Friths.
Reconstruction drawing of the original by
kind permission of the widow
of Lawrence Greenwood |
|
|
Abraham Ormerod's house at Stoneswood |
From Mr. Helliwell’s they went to Stoneswood and enacted similar outrages at the residence of Mr. Abraham Ormerod, who has also the misfortune to be a Guardian. They found instruments of destruction here in the iron palisades, with which they smashed in the panels of the doors. |
|
|
The dwellings of Messrs. Greenwood and Bros. at Water-place (Watty) was next visited with similar results.
The mob then went to the shop of one Ann Holt, a provisions dealer, who had rendered herself obnoxious, it would seem, by her frequent and warm advocacy of the new Poor Law. All the windows of her shop were broken, and a quantity of her goods was injured and destroyed.
Mr. Oliver, a surgeon, the Registrar of Births and Deaths, and brother to Mr. Royston Oliver, next received their attentions. His house and shop were broken in to and sacked as the others had been; his bottles and vials were smashed, and his medicines thrown into the street.
A more important object was then visited, for passing along the street the rioters fell upon the residence of Mr. James Taylor, which is known as Todmorden Hall. |
|
|
This is a venerable stone mansion, situate in a shrubbery on the left of the road from Rochdale. Mr. Taylor, who is a grandson of the celebrated Whitworth doctor, is a Magistrate and of course a Guardian ex officio. This place the mob completely surrounded, smashed nearly every one of the numerous windows, and hewed the door with sharp instruments, apparently shovels, which they found in the garden house. |
Todmorden Hall |
|
|
Entering the dining room by the window, every article of costly and splendid furniture it contained was shivered; all the numerous family portraits, except one, were cut with knives and irrevocably destroyed, and the fragments of furniture being piled in a heap were set fire to, and the mob then retired. The servants fortunately entered the room as the mob left it, and a few buckets of water being applied the fire was extinguished without doing serious damage. Mr. Taylor was at Liverpool, and the elder Mrs. Taylor, the children and the servants only were at home. The instruments of destruction, as is evident from those left in the house, were large clubs, stems, roots, and gnarled branches of trees with great pieces of rock, apparently walling stones. |
|
|
|
A garden shovel was thrown through the laundry window; the handle was broken, probably with hewing at the back door. Another shovel, with the handle bloody, was hurled through the window of the library on the second floor. A large stone was deposited on one of the shelves beside the books, and several large clubs were left on the floor. |
|
|
A more humble individual next experienced the vengeance of the lawless multitude. Mr. James Suthers of Toad Lane, a beer shop keeper and collector of rates under the Guardians was served as his neighbours had been.
|
|
|
Hence they went to Hare Hill, the residence of Mr. James Greenwood, where they broke every thing, making a complete wreck of the splendid furniture; they threw some of the silver plate into the brook, and finished by setting fire to the house, which would have been certainly destroyed had not the neighbours flocked in when the mob left and vigorously applied water to the flames; this was not effected, however, without difficulty, and not until the principal staircase had been destroyed. |
Hare Hill House |
|
|
Henry Atkinson, a shoemaker in the village of Todmorden, was next assailed. His shutters and windows were dealt with as others had been. Here they were addressed by Mr. Robinson of The Stones, one of the overseers who had resisted the Poor Law Commissioners and Guardians. He represented to them the folly of destroying property, which the country would have to make good, and requested them to desist and go to their houses. They said as it was he who gave the advice, he should be obeyed, and they immediately broke up and dispersed.
In a very short time afterwards, a troop of the 5th Light Dragoons from Burnley entered the village at a smart trot; there was then no enemy to encounter. This was about half past seven o’clock. The Dragoons were followed by two companies of the 86th Foot, also from Burnley, and on the arrival of the latter the cavalry returned. On Thursday a Bench of six Magistrates assembled at the Buck Inn and swore in about 110 special constables. At that time all was quiet in the village and neighbourhood. |
|
TODMORDEN FRIDAY NOV. 23RD.
A party of the 5th Light Dragoons from Burnley under the command of Captain Bolton took up quarters in the town this morning. A troop of the 3rd Dragoon Guards from Manchester occupied the village of Littleborough on Thursday night, and last night additional cavalry, with two pieces of artillery, marched into Rochdale.
(One of these soldiers was Lance Sergeant Anthony Hodgins, an Irishman. He arrived in Todmorden with the rest of the party at 7.30pm on 22nd November 1838. Whilst billeted in the town he met and fell in love with 21 year old Ann Stansfield. In April of the following year they eloped and married at Halifax Parish Church. After the end of his army career they settled in Todmorden. They had seven children.)
At Todmorden the working population were perfectly peaceable. The Magistrates, seven in number, met at the Buck and took depositions.
The mob on Wednesday was composed apparently of factory hands; no stonemasons or excavators were noticed amongst them. About a couple of hundred boys preceded the main body, and as usual commenced the mischief. The mob of the previous Friday was differently composed, of which more will probably be said next week.
In no instance, so far as has come to our knowledge, did they attempt to inflict personal injury; in no instance did they consume liquors, nor is anything said as to their having stolen articles of value as plate etc.
At several places they made free with eatables, and at Hare Hill, the residence of Mr. James Greenwood, they took a quantity of preserves, with beef, cheese, and other substantial articles of food. At this place the configuration was most perilous; they set fire to a closet under the stairs in the servants’ hall, and the whole of the smashed furniture was ignited in the middle of the floor, so that the room was in a strong blaze, and a few more minutes would have been sufficient to render the building irrecoverable.
Miss Greenwood acted with great spirit and presence of mind, and the bearing of Mr. Greenwood was courageous, but too rash. |
|
|
Hare Hill House |
A man made a blow at some valuable furniture with a heavy bludgeon; he missed his aim, and Mr. Greenwood struck him with an iron rake on the back of his head, and afterwards on the shoulder. The mob called to turn him out, but he maintained his position at the foot of the stairs, after having placed his sister and the servants in the cellar, and his mother and another lady in one of the bedrooms. |
|
|
At Mr. William Greenwood’s of Water-place, (Watty) the rioters called out “Halt!” and the boys, who went in front, deliberately armed themselves with bludgeons from some timber near at hand. They then attacked the house, and demolished every window about the place, and most of the furniture. |
Watty House |
|
|
THE TIMES NOVEMBER 29TH 1838
TODMORDEN SATURDAY
About 150 special constables, who had been sworn in on Thursday, assembled at the White Hart and shortly afterwards, supported by parties of the military, infantry and cavalry, with several Magistrates, they proceeded to Lumbutts near Mankinholes, where the outrage on the two Halifax constables was perpetrated, and there surrounded the High Mill of Messrs. Fielden and Brothers.
Some of the Halifax police and special constables entered the mill and took prisoners, near 40 men and youths whom they found at work, and against whom information had been laid for the riots of 16th and 21st inst. The prisoners were escorted back to Todmorden, where two of the men were identified as having been concerned in the attack on Todmorden Hall, and 14 in the riot at Mankinholes on the Friday previous. The former were sent off immediately, under escort of cavalry, to the New Bailey at Manchester, preparatory to their transmission to Kirkdale; the latter 14 were similarly dispatched to York for trial at the next assizes.
The Magistrates were Messrs. Ralph, Waterhouse and Briggs of Halifax, Royds of Rochdale, and Crossley and Taylor of Todmorden. On the evidence against the prisoners being concluded, Mr. John Fielden, who had some time before entered the room, offered bail for the whole of his workmen. He asked by what authority the constables and military had entered his mill? Mr. Royds said: “for the purpose of apprehending rioters, Mr. Fielden.” Mr. Fielden then said he tendered bail for the whole of his men. Mr. Royds said that would depend on whether the Magistrates chose to accept it. Eventually, they declined, and the men were committed.
On Saturday it was remarked that but few men were to be seen in the streets of Todmorden, the spectators were chiefly women and girls. On Sunday a great number of strangers visited the place to view the devastation the rioters had made. It was rumoured, and not without authority, that the Guardians intend now to resign, but nothing decisive had at that time taken place.
(The names of the arrested men are not recorded in The Times. However, the two men sent to the New Bailey in Manchester were George Turner and William Lord. Details of their trial are below. The 14 men taken to York were as follows:) |
|
William
Crabtree (aged 17)
John Crabtree (19)
Abraham
Crabtree (25)
John Fielden (22)
Joseph
Gaukroger (27)
Thomas
Greenwood (22)
James
Kershaw (25) |
James
Kershaw (52)
Gibson
Lord (17)
Jeremiah
Sutcliffe (18)
Joseph
Taylor (25)
Enoch Thomas (32)
John
Uttley (24)
John
Walton (28) |
|
|
THE LONDON TIMES 8TH APRIL 1839
NORTHERN CIRCUIT LIVERPOOL ASSIZES
FRIDAY APRIL 5TH 1839
CROWN COURT
George Turner and William Lord were indicted for having, on 21st November last, at Todmorden, with divers other persons riotously assembled and begun to pull down the house of William Helliwell, and also a certain mill of the said William Helliwell.
Mr. Sergeant Atcherley and Mr. Brandt conducted the prosecution: Mr. Adolphus, Mr. Bliss and Mr. Blair defended Lord, and Mr. Dundas and Mr. Cobbett defended Turner.
It appeared from the evidence of Mr. Helliwell that the neighbourhood had been formed into a Poor Law Union, which was very unpopular there. On the 21st November a large mob of persons assembled, but after a time dispersed. About 30 persons assembled a second time, who smashed his windows, broke the iron rails in front of his house, and the panels out of the front door. There was a great deal of shouting; stones and sticks flew about in all directions, and his wife and children were in great alarm.
James Greenwood deposed that after the mob left Helliwell’s they went to a Mr. Bacup’s, whose house they treated as they had done Helliwell’s. They then proceeded to witness’s brother’s, where they broke the rails down and windows, and injured the mill. Witness then went to his house at Harehill and ordered the house to be secured. He put the family in the cellar for safety. They demolished the doors and windows, broke in, and set the kitchen, breakfast room and staircase on fire. Some cried “Bring him out; bring him out! Kill him; he’s a Bastille chap!”
Eli Crossley: He was bringing his children home from school. Hearing the mob he hastened to get them in the house. He saw Lord and Turner in the mob. He had known Turner a long time; they went to school together. Lord he had known about 6 months. He was called “Silly Billy”, he could not tell why.
Richard Chambers: Is a stationer in Todmorden. Saw the mob. 500 people went to Helliwell’s. He observed Turner in the middle of the crowd carrying a large stick. Lord was walking on the causeway, but not in the crowd. The mob went on to Mr. Fielden’s house.
Several other witnesses spoke to the violence of the mob, and to the presence of the prisoners, particularly of Turner.
Mr. Adolphus addressed the jury for Lord, and called some witnesses who spoke to his being quietly at home as soon as he could get there, and that his presence with the mob was involuntary, he not concurring in their transactions.
Mr. Dundas addressed the jury for Turner. Lord was acquitted and Turner found Guilty. Sentence deferred.
|
|
|
Meanwhile, the 14 men sent to York for trial were joined by a further 3 alleged insurgents; William Barrett, John Helliwell and Arthur Lowden. Mr. John Fielden's offer to bail these men was initially refused, although they were eventually granted bail in January 1839. The men were tried at York on 21st March 1839 and all 17 were bound over.
Following the riots,
the government sent a group to investigate whether John Fielden
had incited, encouraged or supported the rioters. They failed to
find anyone willing to testify against him and his case was dropped.
In the end, only one man was imprisoned and the Magistrate commented
that he felt others were more responsible for the riots than those
in the dock. This was a veiled reference to John Fielden's role
in the affair.
The
Board of Guardians could not operate successfully without representation
from Todmorden & Walsden and Langfield. This fact, together
with the fear aroused by the violence of the riots and the intimidation
of the supporters of the law, led them to go along with the rebels.
They agreed to continue with the old system of poor relief
and abandon any idea of building a Union Workhouse.
The
Overseers continued to collect their own Poor Levy and to distribute
it as "out relief" as before. No-one was sent to any workhouse
if they had somewhere to live, and life continued as before. The
townships made use of 3 small Poorhouses at Gauxholme, Stansfield
and Wadsworth for those who had no-where else to live.
On
31 March 1843, the two townships appointed their first Guardians
as Relieving Officers and Collectors. Thomas Heyworth aged 49 of
Woodhouse and John Sutcliffe aged 45 of Underbank were elected as
Relieving Officers, and Richard Ingham aged 54 of Haugh, Langfield,
was elected as Poor Rate Collector for Langfield.
Todmorden
and Langfield townships were so vehement in their opposition to
the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act that in 1844 the Todmorden Union
was allowed to abandon the requirement to provide a workhouse. However,
the two townships still refused to join the Union and only after
40 years did this opposition cease.
READ WHAT HAPPENED NEXT
BACK TO TOP |
|