Captain John Stuart

 

 

Captain John Stuart – Is he the father of Bushyhead  

 

Who is Bushyhead (b.c.1758 d.bef 1820)?

 

Bushyhead was the son of Captain John Stuart and Susannah Emory, who met

at Fort Loudon, Tennessee, and in the celebration of the fort’s completion, 

became romantically involved.   Bushyhead never knew John Stuart and never

used the surname Stuart.  His mother died rather young, too, and Bushyhead

was raised as a Cherokee by his mother and his Cherokee kin, in the line of

Attakullakulla (kin by blood or marriage – not sure).  He went by his Cherokee

name, Oo-no-du-tu or Oo-no-to-ta.  He married two Cherokee women and had six known children.  The name Bushyhead is so well regarded

among the Cherokee that, east or west, having the name Bushyhead brings

nods of respect.  One reason is that the name is a link from a forgotten

people:  the Lower Cherokee, and from a defiant people: the Chickamauga,

and from a redeemed people:  the early Christian Cherokee who found a

faith much older and greater than the whites imagined.   Rev. Jesse

Bushyhead (son of the Fort Loudon child) was a simple testimony against

the “Christian white” program of genocide against the tribe.   Of course,

there is growing evidence that Bushyhead was the Chickamauga leader

“Tahlonteeskee”.

 

 

 

Who is John Stuart?

 

He was the father of Bushyhead.  In other words, Bushyhead owes nothing to

being the son of Captain John Stuart but Stuart would be long forgotten if he

were not the father of Bushyhead.  

 

But let us consider his father, John Stuart.  Books have been written about him

but his family – even his identity – is poorly known.  The earnest sketch:  “John

Stuart, Beloved Father of the Cherokees” by John L.Nichols of Highlander

Magazine (Sep/Oct 1993 issue) has been reprinted and posted online numerous

times but is suspect.

 

The book by John R. Alden,  John Stuart and the Southern Colonial Frontier

(1944)  is likewise unreliable. 

 

Online genealogical sources on John Stuart are even worse, as tends to be the

case in cyberspace. 

 

 

 

 

First, regarding his date of birth, which Nichols gives as 25 September 1718,

at Inverness, Scotland.  That seems reasonable for the moment.  Then his

date of immigration, which one source says is 1733 and Nichols says is 1748.

This is where the trouble begins.

 

John Stuart, a planter, of Saint Helena Island (Colleton County), and his

wife Mary, received land on that island in 1733 (memorial entered 11 April

1733).  The same John Stuart gifted 350 acres on Saint Helena Island “to

his friend and son-in-law” James Megget, “for love & affection”.  The deed

was recorded on 17 May 1736.   On 27 May 1737 John Stuart and wife

Mary sold 950 acres to Joseph Elliot Sr. of Saint Helena Island.  The bill

of sale was witnessed by James and Magdalene Megget.  And on 23

September 1747, John Stuart sold 535 acres in Colleton County to

Joseph Ladson.

[Langley, SC Deed Abstracts, I, 261; II,30; III, 36]

 

 

On 12 Nov 1751 he joined the SC Commons House of Assembly as a representative from Saint Helena Parish in Charleston. 

[SC Commons Journal  of  12 Nov 1751.]

 

In 1756 he again joined the SC Commons House of Assembly as a representative and was in attendance from January to May.

[SC Commons Journal  of  13 Jan,  22 Apr, 30 Apr 1756, etc.]

 

When his later expenses from Fort Loudon were rejected by the House of

Assembly it was noted that Stuart  was a former member of the House and

should have known the standards by which expenses should be submitted.

[SC Commons Journal  of   9 Mar, 6 May, 29 Jun 1757 ]

 

On 16 Jan 1759 Capt. John Stuart presented a letter from Saint Helena’s Parish to the representatives at the Assembly.   

[Minutes of the Vestry of St. Helena’s Parish, South Carolina 1726-1812, edited by A.S. Salley, Jr.,

(Columbia, SC: State Press, 1919) p.102 or p.125 in original minutes]

 

From the above we have to conclude that if John Stuart was born 1718, he

could not have a son-in-law over 21 in 1736.  If that’s John Stuart’s father,

which is quite reasonable,  and our John Stuart joined him (or returned) in

1748, there would be a “Sr.” and “Jr.” in the records.  Let’s say the elder

John Stuart died in 1748 and his estate was handled in Scotland or

London, as often happened.  The Charleston records would make note of

that.  If we are dealing with two different John Stuarts, one who served in

the Assembly in 1751 and one who served in 1756, we might expect the

record to differentiate them, as “John Stuart of St. Helena” versus “John

Stuart of Charleston”.  But the 1759 letter (see above) makes them one and

the same.  

 

In short, there is an identity problem that has not been worked out by Stuart

researchers.

 

 

 

More from the records

 

On 23 December 1752 William and Mary Jones of Craven County released

title to John Stuart of Berkeley County.

 

On 6 November 1755 John Stuart witnessed a deed in Charleston.

 

On 14 January 1762 John Stuart witnessed a lease in Charleston.

 

On 20 April 1764 John Stuart witnessed a lease in Charleston.

 

On 22 December 1767 John Stuart, Esq. and wife Sarah acquired some

land in Charleston.

 

On 5 February 1768 John Stuart, Esq. and wife Sarah released by mortgage to

Alex Petrie, gentleman,  the above land in Charleston.

[all from Langley, SC Deed Abstracts, III, 3,170, 213, 327,372]

 

   

 

Other biographical data, unconfirmed

 

Martha Stuart married Thomas Dalton and had a son William Dalton.  She was

the sister of John Stuart, and John was the overseer of her property.  William

was 21 by 1770, as he sold land in that year.

[Langley, SC Deed Abstracts, IV, 179]

 

Henry Stuart, a deputy Indian Commissioner under John Stuart, is said reliably

to be John Stuart’s brother.

 

 

Alexander Cameron, a deputy Indian Commissioner under John Stuart, is said

to be John Stuart’s nephew or son-in-law.

 

 

John Stuart went into business with Patrick Reid in 1746 in England but when

Reid died in April 1754, creditors came after Stuart in Charleston, leaving him

broke in 1755.

[Nichols, John Stuart, Beloved Father of the Cherokee, online]

 

 

 

 

John Stuart married Sarah c.1748 and had four children by her: the first was

Sarah Christiana (b.1749), then came two other daughters, then John Joseph

Stuart who became a distinguished British officer, a general, knighted after

Napoleon’s defeat in 18   .

[Nichols, John Stuart, Beloved Father of the Cherokee, online]

 

 

John Stuart enters into Indian Affairs

 

 

On 7 March 1755 Governor James Glen presented the SC Commons House

of Assembly with reports, letters, and his own recommendation that a fort be

built among the Overhill Cherokee (this would be Fort Loudon).  John Stuart

was appointed to the committee to review the material and present suitable

resolutions.  (The same reports considered a month earlier had resulted in an

impasse and tension between the Assembly and the governor.)  

[SC Commons Journal  of  7 Mar 1755]

 

In 1756 John Stuart was again an Assembly representative and, with the

construction of Fort Loudon nearly complete, he was able to get himself a

commission as a captain of the provincial troops (militia) to do a nine month

tour of duty stationed at the fort under the command of British officer Capt.

Raymond Demere.  Whether he did this for income or for political gain (or

both) is hard to determine.  He brought some Cherokee down to Charleston

in December 1756 and escorted them back to the Overhills. He had such a

good time at Fort Loudon that he brought some of the Cherokee (including

Little Carpenter or Attakullakulla) back to Charleston in March 1757.  Little Carpenter was not well-liked by the Assembly at the time, however, and

Stuart’s enormous expense claims (which featured an ungodly quantity of rum)

were rejected.

[SC Commons Journal  of  5 Mar, 6 May , 29 Jun 1757, etc.;  SC Indian Docs  (3) 169, etc]

 

By his own account (muster pay roll for his company), John Stuart was on

active duty for his Fort Loudon tour from 15 July 1756 to 27 March 1757.

[SC Commons Journal  of  29 Jun 1757, Murtie June Clark, Colonial Military, 1072-1073]

 

 

After that there was a threat of  an attack by sea by the French so John

Stuart was sent to fortify a cannon house on Beaufort Island.  In February

1758, he re-submitted his Fort Loudon expense claims in the form of a

memorial:   

 

 

Wednesday the 8th of February 1758.

 

"...A Memorial of Captn. John Stuart was presented to the House & read Setting

forth as Viz.

 

 

That your memorialist being Stationed at Fort Loudoun in the upper Cherokee

Nation was in December 1756 ordered by Captn. Raymond Demeré, then Commanding

there, to attend a number of Indians to Charles Town. That he was obliged to

hire horses to Carry Provisions, Tent & other Necessarrys for So Long and

Tedious a Journey in the middle of winter.

 

That your Memorialist has never been allowed any horse or Bas money by the Government,

but Lost four in the Country's Service.

 

That the Little Carpenter and other headmen of the Over hill Towns

having Called a meeting of the headmen of the middle Settlements at Ayree he

insisted that your memorialist Should Purchase a Kegg of Rum for them, of Mr.

Butler, the Trader there, which rather than differ with them at that Juncture,

he thought best for the Public Good to Comply with.

 

That the Same happen'd at Keowee, where your Memorialist On Account of a general

meeting was Obliged to purchase another Kegg of Rum of John Chevillette Esqr.,

Commissary.

 

That your Memorialist with the Indians being detained at Ayree six days was obliged to buy

a Hogg & fifty weight of Bacon to Satisfy hunger there, and to prevent Starving on the Road.

That his own and the mens Provissions who were with him were at same time saved at fort

Loudoun.

 

That as the Indians were under great apprehensions of Loosing their Horses about Charles

Town, and gave your Memorialist to understand that in Such Case they would Expect

Payment from the Government, he agreed with persons in Emelia Township to take Charge

of Eighteen horses who obliged themselves to deliver them to the Indians at their return

from Charles Town in Consideration of which your Memorialist Paid Twenty Currency

for Every horse.

 

That Your Memorialist Exposed himself to much Trouble & Fatigue Accompanying the

Indians in their Short Stages at Such a Season which he did from a principle of Love to

his Country and the Cause in which he was Embarked & not from any View of Emoluments

or Profit. Neither was his taking Charge of or accompanying them incumbent upon him

from any Military obligation. But as your Memorialist was unavoidably at a great

E[x]pence in Living with and Treating the headmen he charges £150 Currency for

Extraordinary Expences Coming down and Returning and had he been Minute in the

Charge the Sum would have been much Larger.

 

That your memorialist gave in the annexed Account to the Last Assembly who thought

proper to provide only Ten pounds Currency for Payment of it, which he attributes

to his not being on the Spott to Explain & Give reasons for the Sundry Charges.

 

That your Memorialist from a Consciousness of his having Bona fide Laid out and

Paid for the Sundry Articles charged in the annexed account, of his having neither wantonly

or unnecessarily Squandered any money and of his having no other View in the whole

But Public good, Hopes & Expects from the Justice & honour of the Commons house of

Assembly that Sufficient Provision Will be made for his reinbursement & therefore Praying

&ca.

 

Read also the Account Mentioned in the said memorial amounting [to] £354:17:6.

 

Order'd That the said Memorial & Account be referred to the Consideration of the

Committee appointed to audit the Accounts of the Creditors of the Public, And

that they do Examine the Matter of the Said Memorial & report the Same with

their Opinion thereupon to the House.

 

[SC Commons House 8 Feb 1758]

 

 

 

 

John Stuart returns to Fort Loudon

 

In 1759 there was some trouble between the Cherokees and North Carolina

settlers.  In October 1759 Oconostota and other headmen of the Cherokee

wanted to go to Charleston to assure Governor William Lyttleton that they wanted no war, only peace. The governor arranged to meet them at Keowee in February

(when smallpox was less virulent).  Stuart arrived at Fort Loudon on 27 October 1759.   A letter from the commander of the fort, Capt. Paul Demere, confirms this:

 

 

1759, November 3, Fort Loudoun

 

Capt. Stuart arrived here with his Party 27th. Of last Month. He has brought with him

the Amunition, some Salt, and Flour. since his Arrival, we had severall meetings with

the Indians, in the Fort; and Yesterday was fixed by Old Hop and the other Head Men.

To give a pofsitive Answer of what they had to say. Accordingly they came, and when

we were all together, the Little Carpenter gave his Talk, and as I am sure that he knew

very well that all the Towns were suspicious that he wou’d say something concerning

what had hapned, they were jealous of him, concerning satisfaction that they had to give;

he said nothing on that subject, only that he was sorry that the Indians had not been so

good on their word, after the Talk he gave them before he went away; that the White

People were intirely under his care and he wou’d protect them, and desired that I wou’d

send his Talk to your Excellency, which I do inclosed. After he had done, Old Hoop gave

his Talk, and according to the custom, said nothing to the purpose, but went on saying,

that as his Brother the Great Warriour [Oconostota] was in Charles Town, and had

conculted with your Excellency, he cou’d give no Answer, til he shou’d see him; in

my Opinion, they do not intend to give any satisfaction, and seem to afraid of the

other Towns.

 

I hope they will send Flour soon from Keowee, I have but 31 bags in the Store. Capt.

Stuart has left behind __owt. Of Powder, that was intirely spoiled.

I am Sir

Your Excellency’s
Most Obedient and Most Humble Servant

Paul Demere

            [Letterbooks of William Henry Lyttleton 1756-1760, also SC Ind Docs (3),         ]

 

 

John Stuart himself sent letters to the governor from Fort Loudon dated

15 November 1759, 22 November 1759, and 3 December 1759.  There was

tension among the Cherokee for three four reasons:  (1) the war with the

French exposed the tribe to attack from the north and south; (2) the tribe had

recently assisted Virginia in fighting the French Indians and had been

punished, not rewarded, for it; (3) Gov. Lyttleton suspended trade with the

Cherokee who had entered into a war against the French on his behalf and

the tribe was not ready for winter – they depended on trade to survive against

their enemies and against the harsh winter.  (The French-supplied Creeks to

the south were fine and invited the Cherokee to join them – or die.); (4) Gov.

Lyttleton made the impossible request that the Cherokee turn over the men

who attacked the Virginia [North Carolina] settlers.  Those men were warriors

and they went to Virginia to help.  On their way back they were attacked by

settlers, so they retaliated against settlers.  There was nothing wrong with this

to the Cherokee.

 

A subtext to the tension was the jealousy and competition between the Lower

and the Overhill Cherokee.  The Lower Cherokee achieved the honor in the

north but they also committed the attacks.  The Overhill Cherokee received a

better fort and were receiving better trade deals with Georgia and Virginia.

Many of the Lower Cherokee, like Oconostota, moved to the Overhills to be

close to Fort Loudon and the economic possibilities it offered.  But Old Hop,

the aging leader of the Overhills (and “Emperor” for all the Cherokee), was

facing challenges to his leadership from a half dozen headmen, especially

Oconostota and Little Carpenter.  Truth is, none of the headmen had the

power to deliver the culprits, who were still under their war chief, Warhatchy

of Keowee.  He was the leading culprit.

 

This letter from Stuart indicates that Little Carpenter was going to take over

negotiations with Lyttleton with or without Old Hop’s participation:

   

 

Sir

This well be delivered by the Carpenter who Setts out this morning with a firm

Resolution of accomodating matters with Your Excellency, he Expects that the

Transgrefsors witll be Demmanded and has Just told me that his Voice will be for

Delivering them.  he may at first plead for them as he Affects popularity, but I am

confident he will fall into all your Excellency’s measures, he Goes without Speaking

to, or Receiving any mefsage from Old Hop and Says that  he only waits for orders

from Your Exey to take upon him the Execution of the Old Fellows office. This at

present is the Grand point he has in View. We hear nothing with worth Communicating

many Idle Stories flying about amongst the Indians suggested by their fears.

I am with the Greatest Respect

Your Excellency’s
most obedient & most humble Sert

John Stuart

Fort Loudoun 7th Decem. 1759
To His Excelly Govenor Lyttelton

            [Letterbooks of William Henry Lyttleton 1756-1760, also SC Ind Docs (3),         ]

 

 

 

 

War breaks out 

 

In December 1759 a conference between the Cherokees and Governor William Lyttleton at Keowee was arranged.  With travel and supply considerations, the

meeting was set for February 1760.  It was Lyttleton’s intention to “chastise”

the Cherokee and bring military honors to his faltering governorship.  He came

with troops for war, the Cherokee traveled with families for peace. Even the

soldiers were not comfortable with Lyttleton and many of them deserted.

(There were quite a few halfbreeds in those militia companies.)

 

Negotiation was uneasy.  Lyttleton hastily departed for Charleston after

giving secret orders to arrest and detain the Cherokee headmen at Fort Prince George.  The Lower Cherokee rose up from Keowee and blockaded the

fort.  War came to Fort Prince George in February 1760.

 

The war did not immediately reach Fort Loudon but that fort was cutoff from supply and support.  On 20 March 1760, the fort came under siege, which was

more of a hostile embargo than a continuous attack.  The Cherokee wives of soldiers smuggled food into the fort, but the threat of starvation was very real.  The embargo continued into the following summer, forcing the soldiers to seek

a surrender.  On 7 August 1760, John Stuart negotiated terms of surrender with    

the Cherokee, under Oconostota.  On 9 August, under Captain Paul Demere,

the fort was given up and the men marched out.  Some Cherokee fell on them

the next morning at their camp and killed 19 or so men, including Demere.

[Herbert Ravenal Sass, The Story of the South Carolina Lowcountry, (West Columbia, SC : J Filyer  

Publishing Co., 1957) Vol I, 150-155]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Little Carpenter saved John Stuart?

 

In some accounts, all the men are killed except Stuart, who is saved by Little

Carpenter against the intentions of Oconostota.  There was an attempt to get

Stuart to help the Cherokee take a cannon to use on Fort Prince George, but

Stuart was not going to allow himself to be put to that use.  He could not go

down the trail back to Charleston because the Lower Cherokee would kill him.

 

 

October 4, 1760

By an express last Wednesday evening, who left Col. Byrd’s camp at Reed Creek,

(about 200 miles from Ft. Loudoun) on the 16th ult.  We have the agreeable news that Capt. John Stuart’s being safely conducted thither by the honest and faithful friend of

the English, the Little Carpenter, who conveyed him away from Fort Loudoun on the

31st of August, under the pretence of going a hunting for six days.

Capt. Stuart intended to make the best of his way hinter, but Col. Byrd advised him

first to go to Williamsburg, whither he was accordingly going.

After the garrison of Fort Loudoun had marched 16 miles and encamped, the Indians gradually withdrew in the evening; at dusk there was not one of them with our people; but on the 10th of August in the morning, a serjeant and 12 men were beginning to

march and the rest were packing up their bundles to follow, a soldier from the advance guard discovered many Indians and gave the alarm; upon this Capt. Stuart ran towards the river or brook and called to the men to stand their arms; the Indians in the grass immediately fired within 60 yards, and put our men, who were unprepared for such a piece of treachery, into the utmost confusion.  Capt. Demere received two wounds in

the first volley, was directly scalped, and the Indians made him dance about for their diversion for some time, after which they chopped off one hand or arm, then the other, and so his legs, using the most shocking barbarities on the bodies of others of our people.

About the 27th August Capt. Stuart was promised his liberty, if he would by managing

the cannon, assist the Indians in the reduction of Fort Prince George, who were to set

out against it the 6th of September; but the Little Carpenter prevented his being obliged

to do so.  He purchased Capt. Stuart of a fellow who had taken him prisoner, at  a very considerable price; and has evinced that an Indian can be friendly and humane, in the strongest manner.

http://appalachiansummit.tripod.com/

 

 

So Little Carpenter escorted him through Cherokee country north into Virginia

and Stuart then made his way slowly over the Shenandoah ridge and down

into North Carolina and eventually down to Charleston.  There is no doubt that

Little Carpenter was the main part of Stuart’s rescue, but Oconostota had a

role as well.  Years later, Oconostota visited Stuart in Charleston and was

made a member of the St. Andrews Society, a drinking club for Scotsmen.

He and Stuart were drinking buddies, not enemies, according to a

contemporary, Alexander Hewat (1739-1824), a member of the same club

and the “loyalist historian” who published a memoir in London in 1779.

[Alden, John Stuart and the Southern Colonial Frontier; also Nichols, online]

 

 

 

John Stuart submits more expenses

 

After his release and flight from Fort Loudon,  Stuart, of course, had a new round of expenses to submit and the new governor, William Bull,  requested that Stuart’s  expenses be paid in full (they were and Stuart was even granted a large bonus).

 

 

Mr. Speaker & Gentlemen,

 

Captain John Stuart of our provincial regiment, who was on duty at fort Loudoun

when the unfortunate garrison surrender'd on capitulation to the perfidious

savages, is now happily return'd to his Family in this province, after a long &

expensive journey through Virginia & North-Carolina. As his character is so well

known to you, & his sufferings have been so long pitied, I shall not make any

particular mention of them; but inform you that he hath represented to me, that

on the breach of the capitulation by the Indians he lost his horses, arms,

cloaths, & other things to a considerable, but unascertainable value: & that his

journey through Virginia & North-Carolina was very expensive to him: I

therefore, very cordially, recommend his case to your consideration; & doubt not

but you will do therein what is becoming the representatives of the people to a

faithful & suffering servant.

 

The 21 January 1761.

              William Bull.

 

[SC Commons House 21 Jan 1761]

 

    

John Stuart leaves Indian nation for good

 

Although he was soon appointed Commissioner of Indian Affairs, John Stuart

never returned to the Cherokee.  He was at the Treaty of Hard Labor in South

Carolina, but that was still two hundred miles from Cherokee territory.  He did

send his nephew Alexander Cameron to live among the tribe as Deputy

Commissioner.   Because of the influence of Cameron and Stuart, the tribe

remained loyal to the British during the Revolution.

 

 


 

 

 

Aftermath of the Cherokee War

 

 

The South Carolina Gazette

September 23, 1761

 

On this day Attakullakulla had his last public audience, when he signed the treaty

of peace and received an authenticated copy under the great seal.  He earnestly

requested that Captain John Stuart might be made chief white man

( Indian Agent ) in their nation.  "All the Indians love him," he said, "and there

will never be any uneasiness if he is there."  His request was granted.  This faithful

Indian afterward dined with the governor, and tomorrow sets out for his own country.  [i][13]

 

Note: “his last” means “his most recent”.  He had several others.

 

In October 1770, Attakullakulla, Oconstota, and John Stuart met again at

Lochaber, South Carolina, to discuss boundaries, illegal white settlements,

and alleged illegal land sales to Alexander Cameron and Richard Pearis.

Much was said, but nothing of saving Stuart’s life.  Since Attakullakulla

mentioned his 1730 trip to England, saving Stuart’s life would have come up

also, especially after Stuart challenged the memory or credibility of the Little

Carpenter.  Excerpts of what each had to say:

 

 

Friday 19th October  1770

The Superintendant [John Stuart] and the Chiefs and Warriors being met as the day before

the Congress was opened as Usual

 

Oucconnastotah Speaks
Father
We have done smoaking, we will proceed on our Talk, our thoughts are Straight and this is a

Clear time of the day, now we have seen one another you are my Father, whom we have met to have a good Talk and I conclude it will be so. I live at the Farthest Town in the Nation, and now we are met I expect we will have a good Talk, I am Come over great Mountains to meet you, which I think Little of.
[Gives a String Whampum]

 

We are all old men who are come over the Mountains there are but four of us and we must wait

a While to Conclude upon it, You are like a small Bird Singing over one's House, but the

Bussiness Cannot be so soon determined, There are four or five old Men come over the

Mountains the Young fellows are gone out to Hunt, and know nothing of this, and will say why

should these old men give away the Land without our knowledge, there are Seven Towns over

the Hills and it is they must Conclude this, and I will go and Talk to the Governor of Virginia

about it. . . .   we will however Talk more of this Bussiness hereafter.

 

 

 

 

 

To the Superintendant
Father
It is the white Hunters that Trouble us, let them go over the Mountains and not Hunt on Holston's River, But Capt.Guess comes into our Grounds and Hunts with Fifty Men, and kills our deer and when we tell him of it, he threatens to Shoot us down; . . . .

I now present you this Calumet with two heads the one looking to the other, which will put you

in mind when you Smoak that you are looking at your Children

 

 

Altahkullahkullah Speaks

I have thought of your proposal all night, and now the day is Come. I will give you my Talk, you are the Messenger that brought the Talk to which I Listened very Attentively, and I therefore expect you will listen as Attentively to mine. . . .  when you all met at Augusta, at the Great Congress, I believe you may Remember what passed and it is now Continued, it seems like Stepping out of the door, to be at the white peoples Settlements. . . .  The Great Being above

is very good and provides for every Body, it is he that made Fire, Bread, and the Rivers to

Run, he gave us the Land, but the white people Seem to want to drive us from it. You are all talking together fast. I always Talk Loud that every body may hear me. I expect to live in Love and Unity with my white Brethren, and as to anything concerning the Land I can give no Answer to it at present. What we say is a Law to our people but it is not the Case amongst the White people for the Traders say different things and have different Regulations. The Inhabitants on this Side the Mountains have driven away all our deer and we find them very Scarce, when we go over the Mountains to Hunt we find Paths troden by the Virginia people and Houses Built everywhere.

. . .  There was a very good King over the Great Water when I was there, who promised me that goods should be Cheap, but they are now very dear, when Mr . Walts [John Watts Sr.] was a Young Man he traded Cheap, but now goods are much dearer , the White People get Lands that Last for ever but the Goods given Us are soon gone, now is the day we have appointed to Conclude the Talk, we never had Such Talks formerly but now all our Talks are about Lands, and the white People Settled thereon are deaf to Us and will not hear.
A String of Whampum  . . .

 

The Superintendant  [John Stuart] Speaks
Brothers
I have attended to what you have said, and in order to give you an Answer I must have Recourse to the Beginning of our Talks about Land.
You have mentioned what passed at the Great Congress at Augusta where Four Governors were present; I shall now put you in mind of something that passed there that you seem to have entirely forgotten. It is true that at Augusta we Talked of Land, but neither the Governors there present nor I were authorised to Transact any Business of that Nature, our meeting was for a different purpose, as you mentioned what passed at Augusta upon that Subject I will repeat it to you, my Memory enables me to do it clearly but, I do not depend upon that entirely. I have got it in Writing.
During the Conferences Altahkullakulla who spoke upon the occasion, complained of Encroachments and in particular of Settlements being made beyond the great Conhoway, or New River, and Claimed Chiswells Mine as your Boundary. Govemor Fauquier endeavoured to Account for the Settlement of the Lands between New River and Holstons River. Allahkullahkullah said that as the abovementioned Country was already Settled, they did not desire the Inhabitants should be obliged to Remove, but hoped no more patents would be granted beyond the Conhoway. The next day Altahkullakulla resumed the Subject, and said they had Considered of the Matter, and gave up the Land between Holstons River and the Kanhoway, and would Confine their Claim to the Lands lying to the Southward and Westward of Long Island in Holstons River; . . .  
In your Talks to me before we met at Hard-Labour two Years ago, you denied what had passed at Augusta, and peremptorily insisted upon all the Lands to the Southward and Westward of Chiswells Mine as your right. The Governor and Council of Virginia made no objections to your pretensions and after my Fruitless Endeavors to learn their Sentiments of the Matter I received orders from the Earl of Shelbume to acquiesce in your demand and a Treaty was Accordingly Concluded for that purpose,. . .    I see a Thousand of your people here, and now you tell me that the Matter cannot yet be determined, that your Young Warriors are out a Hunting and that you are determined to Treat with the Governor of Virginia concerning a Further Cession.
You may do as you please, but the goods are not to be delivered, till the Treaty is Signed and the Cession formally made. My Lord Botetourt has told you that the Business is to be Transacted by me and Nobody Else. I now tell you the Same, and if the Matter is not now Settled, I cannot tell when it will be done, for I shall not be fond of coming so far to meet you for nothing.

Gives a Belt of Black and White Whampum.

http://appalachiansummit.tripod.com/       <<  get Georgia treaty link

 

 

 

 

 

    

John Stuart leaves South Carolina for good

 

Because of his Tory leadership, he was chased out of South Carolina and fled

to Pensacola, Florida, in 1775/6. 

 

 

 

 

He died in Pensacola on 21 March 1779. 

 

A letter dated 26 March 1779 from Pensacola reports:

 

                On Sunday the 21st instant, about 3 o’clock in the afternoon, Col Stuart,

                His Majesty’s sole agent for and Superintendent of Indian Affairs for

                the Southern District of North America, departed this life after a long

                and painful illness, which he bore with resignation for several months…

                [from James Hicks Cherokee website]

 

 

 

Cherokee children of John Stuart

 

John Stuart (d.1779) met  Susannah Emory in September 1756 or so and

was with her until March 1757 or so.  He may have reunited with her in

November 1759 and may seen her off & on until August 1760.  She was

b.1744 and d.bef.1770.  

 

 

            i.              Bushyhead  or  Oo-No-Dutu 

b. 1757/8 or perhaps 1760 at Fort Loudon, Tennessee

                        d. c. 1818

                        m(1) unknown      m(2) Nannie Foreman   

 

 

The name of Bushyhead could not have come from the Cherokee.  The only

one who could have given him that name and have that name stay with him

would be his father, John Stuart, who probably got to see him as a 2-year old.

 

For more on Bushyhead see “On the Trail of Bushyhead”.

 

 


 

 

BACK