History, Statistics, Names of Lot Owners, Rules, Regulations, Etc.,
by W. W. Newman,
Secretary from 1879 to 1895.
For the benefit of lot owners and all who have relatives buried therein;
and also for those who
in future may purchase Lots or use the cemetery.
Church and Cemetery Trustees 1895.
BENJAMIN F. ALDRIDGE, President.
VICTORY DAY.
MAXWELL T. FOWLER, Treasurer. SILAS C. FIELDS.
WM. W. NEWMAN, Secretary
ARTHUR JUDSON.
J. WILSON PARKER.
DANIEL PINCKNEY.
CORYDON L. WEST.
ORRIN B. QUICK, PRINTER
NOS. 3 AND 4 JERRY RESCUE BLOCK,
SYRACUSE. N. Y.
1895.
FIRST PURCHASE 1830
March 26, 1830 Stephen Holmes
and wire sold to Levi Ellis, Volney King and John C. Stanton
(Trustees of the Onondaga
South Hollow Religions Society) for $15.00, twelve rods on the
highway and ten rods back,
or 12 by 10 equal to 120 rods, or three-fourths of an acre
"for a burying ground and
no other purpose."
The Hon. Abner Chapman left
a map of this land which shows that it was divided into four
tiers, each of 14 lots,
running from the highway west, each lot being 8 by 41 feet with a
center roadway 34 feet wide
and alleys 5 feet wide, except that between every two joining
rows of lots there was no
separation. This roadway has been encroached on from 1 to 4 feet
by monuments.
As the custom was. and even
now is, to bury all with heads to the west instead of towards
the main alleys half of
the headmarks were at the foot of graves and by the side of
footmark in the adjoining
lot. If the owners of such lots or the trustees would now
change these headmarks to
the foot of the graves, then all the inscriptions could be read
on each side of the 5 foot
alleys. Next to the highway a space or walk was left which was
afterwards sold as lots
57, 58, 59, 60. These 60 lots are all occupied, and the former or
present owners are as follows.
Beginning at the north east corner, thence west next the
north fence the owners were
or are, lot 57, Leonard P. Fields; 1, Thomas Lawrence; 3,
north part, John Bettys;
south part, Horace Hitchings; 5, Nelson Eaton; 7, Demas Higgins;
9, Cheney Amidon; 11, Harry
Amidon; 13, John Moseley; 15, George W. Anderson; 17, Stephen
Betts and Jesse Salmons;
19, T. Walkup; 21, Justin Parsons 28, Boyd Hueson, 25, Jared W.
Parsons; 27, John Gwilt.
Beginning at the highway,
thence west on the north side of the driveway, the lot owners
were or are, 58, Leonard
P. Fields; 2, Stephen Holmes; 4, south 21 feet, John and Stephen
Chiverton, north 20 feet,
John R. Hitchings; 6, Merwin lot and Mrs. Henry C. Fellows; 8,
John Wright; 10, Cheney
Amidon; 12, Dr. Samuel Kingsley; 14, Orlando F. Fuller; 16. Dr.
George T. Clark; 18, Sylvenus
Merrick, who died in his 99th year; 20, Hiram Holmes, 22,
Daniel Vinton; 24, Gideon
Estes; 26, Andrew Pharis; 28. Benjamin Annable. Beginning at
the highway and south of
the driveway, thence west, 59, Meville Bronson; 29, Gad M.
Lawrence; 31, Henry Langworthy;
33 Hon. Abner Chapman, who left $500. in care of the
M.E. Church as a perpetual
fund, to use the interest in caring for the cemetery, which
has been in part used twice
to buy additions but will he replaced by sale of lots; 35,
Stephen Griffin; 37, Deacon
Levi Ellis; 39, Amasa Chapman; 41, Volney King; 43, Gideon Day;
45, north half, Olmsted
Quick. south half, Albert Ellis; 47, Olmsted Quick; 49, Alvin
Bullard and J. W. Nichols;
51, John Evans; 53, Miles D. Spencer; 55, Joseph Abbey.
Beginning at the southeast
corner, next to highway and south of fence, thence west,
lot 60, Marcus Bronson;
30, Ralph E. Lord; 32, Erastus West; 34, John B. Parker; 36,
Benjamin Griffin; 38, Solomon
Day; 40, Amasa Chapman; 42, Wm. Day and Samuel Ray; 44,
Daniel Day; 46, Lucian Hyde
and Charles M. Quick; 48, Albert W. Ellis; 50, Daniel Bradley;
52, Benjamin Bakeman; 54,
Joseph Haight; 56, Moses M. Dwelle. All these lots are cared for
by the trustees the same
as those on their own purchases.
SECOND PURCHASE 1856.
September 1, 1856. Orrin
C. Knapp sold to Wilson Newman, Abel Amidon and Andrew Pharis,
the Trustees of the Methodist
Episcopal Society of South Onondaga for $90 one-half acre
adjoining in the rear of
the extinct Religious Society's first purchase, the same distance
north and south and six
rods and twelve feet west. This society was properly incorporated
when it was organized and
recorded in the County Clerk's office, and therefore by laws of
I813 is entitled to buy
and hold cemetery lands and funds and bequests for the cemetery.
This half acre was laid
out in double or adjoining lots and 5 foot alleys as were the lots
in the first purchase, except
that the driveway was narrowed, and three tiers of lots,
instead of two were made,
each lot 8 by 30 feet, on each side of the driveway. These 60
lots were numbered, beginning
at the east side of the purchase and south of the driveway
1, 2, 3 to the south fence,
thence north, 4, 5, 6 to the driveway and so on to the west
side and driveway, No. 30.
The north side of driveway is laid out beginning at the east
side and driveway with Stores
Makyes' lot 31, then 32 and 33 to north fence and so on
alternating back and forth
to the southwest corner of this half on the north side of
driveway ending in No, 60
in the double half lot of Henry Miller. The owners were or
are as follows; 1, Sidney
Gilbert; 2, Charles Burgess; 3, Dr. Jonathan Kneeland; 4, George
C. Nichols; 5, Charles Hodgkins;
6, Leonard Hodgkins; 7, Elias B. Bradley, 8, Nehemiah Olds:
9, John Hitchings; 10, Oliver
Nichols; 11, Stutely Wilcox; 12, Alpheus Pinckney; 13, John
W. Newman; 14 A. Fayette
Amidon; 15, Silas Olds; 16, Truman Fenner; 17, Lewis Amidon; 18,
Wilson Newman; 19, Rev.
Francis W. Hamilton; 20, J. Wilson Parker; 21, A. Freeman Amidon;
22, Outerbridge H. Amidon;
23 P.V.C. Amidon; 24, Moses Fowler, Sr. and Maxwell T. Fowler;
25, John Rich; 26 north
15 feet Henry Rich, south 15 feet Oliver Bakeman; 27, George Abbey;
28, Joseph Underhill; 29,
Waterman Fields Sr.; 30, David Abbey.
Beginning north of driveway
at the southeast corner the lot owners were or are, 31, Stores
Makyes; 32, D. Hoyt Balch;
33, Francis Gwilt; 34, Thomas Nichols; 35, Abbott H. Fenner; 36,
Stores Makyes; 37, Gilbert
Pinckney; 38, Wm. and Jane Darling; 39, Ezra Bennett: 40,
Lafayette Bronson; 41, Rev.
B. L. North; 42, Thomas Harroun; 43, Abel and Margaret
Sparks-Gay, from whose will
the trustees received $275. in 1895 as a perpetual fund, the
interest of which is to
be used in caring for lots 43 and 57, and also 63 of the 1874
purchase; 44, Elisha Cole;
45, Antrim Fenner; 46, Robert Aldridge; 47, Elisha Cole; 48,
John Belden; 49, John Hildreth;
50, Murray B. Lester; 51, B. F. Hulbert; 52, B. F. Hulbert;
53, Ebenezer Comstock; 54,
Absalom Talbot; 55, south half, Henry Miller, north half, L. D.
Eaton: 56, Edson Bennett;
57, south half, William Newman, north half Abigail Burgess; 58,
Potters Field; 59, David
Fulford; 60, north half, L. D. Eaton, south half Henry Miller.
THIRD PURCHASE 1874.
July 10, 1874, Edgar Lawrence
and wife sold to Moses M. Dwelle, Leonard Hodgkins and B. F.
Hulbert, trustees of the
M. E. Church or society, one and one-twentieth acres of the same
distance north and south,
and west to the east line of Edward Belding's Farm for $250.
This was laid out with a
circle in the center for teams to turn around in funeral
processions; and then into
lots as far as possible, 8 by 30 feet, with 2 feet alleys on
one side and 5 feet alleys
on the other. The lots are numbered front the northeast corner
alternately south and north
to the northwest corner of this purchase, making 122 lots.
The numbers and owners as
far as sold are given, and numbers only with a dash when the lot
is unsold; 1 Stephen Gwilt:
2, Joseph French; 3, north half George W. Cole; south half,
Julia Wells; 4, Gilbert
Pinckney; 5, Waterman Field, Jr. 6, Frederick South; 7, south half,
unsold: north half, Cyrus
Webb; 8, W. S. Baker, 14 feet, B. F. Aldridge, 16 feet; 9, Wm.
L. Fisk; 10, Leonard Annable
15 feet, Edwin Rodgers 15 feet; 11, Joseph Bennett; 12, ---;
13, ---; 14, north half
Azariah Hulett, south half Henry Wilson; 15, Abbott Fenner; 10,
Polly Shand; 17, north half
Mary Abbey, south half ---; 18, ---; 19, ---; 20, ---; 21,
Emmet Fields; 22, south
half, Wm. Houser, north half Abbott Wilcox; 23, ---; 24, ---; 25
and front triangle, Wm.
W. Newman; 26 and front triangle, Daniel Pinckney 27, ---; 28, ---;
29, John Sharp; 30, Alexander
Harroun; 31, Silas C Fields; 32, Samuel Kingsley; 33, Chas.
Kane; 34, ---; 35, ---;
36, Wm. Budlong; 37, Oliver Nichols; 38, Martin W. Estes; 39 and
40, Outerbridge H. Amidon;
41 and 42, Electa and Gilbert Pinckney; 43 and 44, Moses Fowler
Jr.; 45, Frank Presley;
46, Wm. M. Nichols; 47, Mrs. Underwood; 48, ---; 49, Joseph W.
Abbey; 50, Charles G. Lathrop;
51, George B. Quick, 52, Alanson West; 53 and 54, Stephen
Anderson; 55, Lorenzo Day;
56, Geoge Day; 57 and 58, Benjamin F. Wilcox; 59, Nancy Norton;
60, Dempster Browning; 61,
Frank and Corydon R. West; 62, James Williams; 63, Phineas
Sparks; 64, ---; 65, ---;
66, ---; 67, north half James Leamy, south half Winfield Webster;
68, north half, Welcome
Browning, south half, George Dillabough; 69, Wm. H. Palmeter; 70,
---; 71, ---; 72 Frank Patterson;
73, South half, George W. Ellis, north half, Rodger
Slater; 74, south half,
John Padbury, north half, ---; 75, Josiah Day: 76, ---; '77,
reserved for a vault; 78.
vault, 79, Frank Horton; 80, Joseph Orr; 81, south connecting
road; 82, A. C. Steele and
Lewis Pickitt; 83 and 84, reserved for south connecting road,
85, 86 and 87, reserved
for a vault; 8, ---; 89, ---; 90, ---; 91, ---; 92, Soldiers' lot
changed to 93 for soldiers'
lot; 94, ---; 95, Gideon Seely; 96, ---; 97, ---; 98, Vault;
99, ---; 100, ---; 101,
---; 102, ---; 103, --- ; 104, Madison R. Claus; 105 to 116
inclusive not sold; 117,
individual graves; 118, ---; 119, ---; 120, ---; 121, and 122
Potters Field.
FOURTH PURCHASE 1885
July 12, 1886 the trustees
made a contract and July 10, 1891 completed said contract by
purchasing of Elias B. Fenner
and wife a duplicate of all these three purchases by paying
for 2 2/5 acres adjoining
on the south $300 an acre, or $720 in all, intending to lay it
out when needed, very nearly
on the same plan as the present cemetery, connecting the two
circles by a road and having
a second driveway to the highway, so that large funeral
processions can enter one
gate and leave by the other. But opening the new part can be
deferred till needed.
The records show that all these four paid for parcels now make four
and seventy-hundreths acres,
costing $1,075; and in all including 242 lots or if duplicated,
484 lots. Besides
these paid for purchases the trustees have $275 of the Margaret Gay
fund in a Syracuse Savings
Bank, but the interest must be used on only three designated
lots. Therefore for the
mowing and caring for all the remaining 239 lots, fences, alleys
and driveways the trustees
have, according to the treasurer's report, January 7, 1895,
only the interest of $321.47
in bank which at 4 percent, is merely $12.85.
What is this annual, paltry
sum for the care of so many lots, graves, alleys and fences?
$100. the bank interest
of $2,500 is needed every year. Therefore, unless owners will
care for their own lots
the cemetery must he sadly neglected. Realizing this necessity,
the trustees raised the
price of lots, which are now only half as much as at Onondaga
Valley, and to enable the
unsold lots to be mowed more cheaply, have set on them about
200 terra cotta corner posts
level with the ground so they will be no obstruction in
mowing. They also
unanimously recommended and insist upon this condition in the future
sales of lots, that graves
be not raised more than 4 to 6 inches, and recommend that
they be level with the ground,
so that a scythe or lawn mower can more easily cut the
weeds and grass.
EXTRACTS FROM RECORDS
From the bound volume of
church and cemetery records from 1875 to 1895 a few extracts are
made. February 6,
1882., voted to increase the price of lots from 50 and 60 cents per
linear foot to $1.00 and
$l.20 per linear foot. $36. may seem a large sum to pay for the
best 30 foot lots, but the
lowest price at Onondaga Valley is 30 cents per square foot,
or twice the price of our
eight square feet which we call one linear foot. Besides we
were obliged to make prices
that would return to the bank the funds that we had virtually
borrowed for enlargements
and to accumulate a fund for the care and improvement of the
cemetery. At the same
date the trustees voted to limit the charges of the sexton, (who
is sometimes never paid
for this service), to $3.00 for a grave in summer and $4.00 when
the ground is frozen in
winter. This too is less than the usual prepaid price. In 1881
the following rules and
regulations were adopted, printed and distributed by the trustees.
1. Visitors are reminded
that these grounds are sacredly devoted to the interment of the
dead; and a strict observance
of the decorum which should characterize the place will be
required of all.
2. The lots will be
sold as they are laid out and mapped, only for cash or satisfactory
security of payment; and
it is expressly reserved that no lot owners shall plant any trees,
shrubs or vegetation that
is liable to spread over or interfere with the alleys or other
lots; and the trustees reserve
the right to remove anything from said lot which they deem
injurious or objectionable.
3. All lot owners
and all persons are forbidden to leave, after burial, or at any time,
longer than is absolutely
necessary, on their lots or any part of the cemetery, any earth
or object that will interfere
with the neat and orderly appearance of the grounds.
4. Children and young
persons shall not resort to the grounds for loitering or amusement,
and all persons are forbidden
to pick or carry away flowers either cultivated or wild, or
pluck trees, shrubs or plants,
not their own private property, or write on, deface or
injure any monument or other
article belonging to the cemetery.
5. Horses, unless
in the immediate care of a competent attendant must be securely
fastened to posts in the
highway.
6. The provisions
and penalties of the laws for the protection of cemeteries will be
enforced in all provable
cases of wanton injury or violation of these rules and regulations.
Trustees and lot owners
should know that statutes and court decisions give the general
control of cemeteries to
the trustees, -- that lot owners have the right of burial but not
of removal, -- that lot
owners have no right to change the grade of lots or walks, nor
put anything on or take
anything away from their lots if it is forbidden by the board of
trustees, -- in brief that
the control of cemeteries is in the hands of their officers
and not of lot owners.
In 1883 a cemetery building
was erected at a cost of $71.65; and in 1884 the highway
fence was made for $80.47.
Thus the M. E. Church trustees have paid for enlargements and
improvements over $1,200.
INJURIOUS PLANTS.
In Abner Chapman's will,
more than 20 years ago, he directed to ''keep June Spreading
Roses and yellow flowering
mosses out of the grounds." The roses have been subdued.
Myrtle or Periwinkle has
been checked; but Money Vine and many other fancied set out
plants are increasing.
Yet ''yellow flowering moss" or Cypress Spurge, Euphorbia
Cyparissias most rapidly
increases, and perhaps in time will overrun the whole cemetery.
Cypress Spurge was brought
from Europe, has root stocks like quack, and spreads from seeds
and rapidly from roots.
Gray's Botany says "In a root a few inches long I have counted
over 200 shoots.''
If a little earth is carried, perhaps to fill a sunken grave, that
has a root of Spurge, it
starts a nuisance in a new place. The probabilities are that
if a large part of the first
two purchased parcels of land were immediately dug over
several times a year and
tons of salt were sown not near the trees killing all vegetation
for two or three years,
and the fence, under trees and highway patches killed also by
frequent digging, it might
at last be destroyed. But what a sum that will cost! Will
it ever be done? And yet
all this damage began in some person's trying to express her
love over a dearly remembered
grave. Sometimes, even now, a new injurious plant is set
out to overrun and injure
the cemetery, -- set out by affection, guided by ignorance.
OBSTRUCTIONS TO MOWING ON LOTS
For about ten years the
American Association of Cemetery Superintendents, representing
the largest cemeteries in
the United States has met annually. In 1889 they appointed a
committee which reported
to the 1890 convention 22 rules for all cemeteries, which were
adopted as recommendations.
Among these are tine following: --''No lots shall be filled
above the established grade'';
"corner stones must not project above the ground"; "mounds
over graves must not be
over four inches in height"; "no enclosure will be permitted;''
"the lower the limit of
headstones the better;" and "all foundations must be as low as
the bottom of graves."
The reasons are every lot corner stone, every footstone. every
raised grave interferes
with the scythe or lawn mower. Even the headmarks in some
cemeteries must not be above
the ground. Who will aid our cemetery by removing their
footstones and leveling
their grave mounds or consent to let others do this for them?
DECORATION DAY
This annual tribute to the
soldiers of 1861-5 is here enlarged so as to decorate the
graves of soldiers in previous
wars; and this annual holiday has helped many to venerate
their ancestors and relatives
who lived and died in peace. In our cemetery in 1895, the
South Onondaga Knapp Post
put on the graves of the following soldiers of three wars a
tribute of flowers.
Revolutionary War. -- Major
David Lawrence, Gideon Seely, Benony Reynolds, who lived
longer than any other person
buried here, -- dying in his 100th year.
War of 1812-15. -- Samuel
Amidon, Elias B. Bradley, Moses Fowler, Benjamin Griffin, Henry
Langworthy, Abel Merrick,
Rev. Eben L. North, Wilson Newman, John Reynolds. -- 9.
War of the Rebellion, 1861-5.
-- Charles Abbey, Milton J. Balch, Abram Claus, Alonzo
Eaton, Gideon Fowler, Win.
L. Fisk, James Fitch, Augustus Fulford, George Gwilt, Seth H.
Kingsley, Theodore Moseley,
Benjamin Mallett, Jonathan Miller, Charles Snyder, Myron
Wilcox. --15.
A few more years will add
many more to the third honor roll of names. The trustees
donated Lot 92 for a soldiers
lot; but as the first soldier to use it was by mistake
buried on lot 93, the vote
was rescinded and lot 93 was given instead. Can a monument
large enough to inscribe
every soldier's name in our cemetery ever be placed on the
soldiers' lot?
CEMETERY IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY.
In June 1887, on Decoration
Day a few persons united in forming an organization to assist
the trustees in caring for
the cemetery. Some signed this pledge "I hereby agree to try
to keep injurious weeds
from my own cemetery lot." Some of the same persons and some
others subscribed $1.00
annually to the Cemetery Improvement Society. But the society
languished; and the balance
of its fund, seven dollars, is hereby given towards the
expense of this pamphlet,
and in the hope that its publication will, in this or the
coming generation revive
this or some similar society.
Reader, will you in the
present and future care for the lot where you may hereafter be
buried, and where the bodies
of dear relatives are laid? Will you see that the corners of
your lot are properly marked
and that every grave on your lot has some record to show who
is there buried? When convenient,
will you examine cemeteries in other villages, see or
inquire what these villages
have done or propose to do; and what you approve, will you
try to carry out on your
own lot and in your own cemetery? We have a dry soil and a fair
location. Our villagers,
our surrounding farmers and many living away who have relatives
buried here should he anxious
to have the cemetery cared for in a reasonably modern way.
Reader, what will you do
to help on the good cause? In June, 1895, the writer was
surprised to find in Oakwood
only a small part of the lots and grounds had been mowed.
The Supt., Burritt Chaffee,
said Oakwood was not bound to care for any lots except when
money was left with the
association for that purpose, -- that they had not half enough
to properly care for the
grounds, -- that $16,000 were expended last year and $25,000
were needed, -- that on
account of expense the best modern cemeteries had but few
obstructions, and approached
well kept lawns as much as possible. Amber recently leveled
every grave mound and threw
away every footstone, seeded the land, and can now run a good
lawn mower over the whole
small cemetery in one day. Cardiff luring the past two years,
has leveled graves, dug
over and salted lots, and greatly improved its cemetery. These
corporations can assess
all lots and in certain contingencies resell lots at pubic auction.
As we cannot assess or resell
we need a large fund at interest. We need the assistance
of lot owners. We need as
few obstructions as possible.
You who live near the cemetery
who have lots and buried relatives should yourselves care
for your own lots or pay
the sexton annually for this service. As the funds increase,
even if always safely invested,
the graves, headmarks, monuments, corner stones, and
probably the injurious plants
will also increase, so that more money and care will be
annually required.
If the lot is not fertile enough for a good lawn, fertilizers and
new seeding should he worked
into the surface soil.
UNMARKED LOTS
The following is a list
of lots that have been buried on; but have no monuments,
headmarks or name on the
lot to show who is buried thereon. First purchase, 15, 19, 20,
22. Second purchase, 1,
8, 10, 15, 16, 21, 22, 30-33,34, 35, 37, 40, 49, 50. Third
purchase, 1, 5, 6,11, 15,
30, 33, 36, 43, 44, 49, 62, 74, 75, or in all 33 lots with no
monument or headmarks and
nearly all without corner lot posts. Where these families are
extinct would it not be
wise for trustees to mark the graves, level the lots and set one
or more non-spreading shrubs
or trees? Judicious bits of park and lawn might add very
much to the beauty of the
grounds.
CONCLUSION
Finally, lot owners, trustees
and every one interested are requested to ask themselves
these or similar questions.
Should I not mark the boundaries of my lot permanently with
cut limestone, marble or
granite posts, so that the exact location may be easily found?
Should I postpone or neglect,
perhaps never to be done, the needed headmark that may
record who lies buried on
my lot? If I am able to buy a monument, should I not give
variety by securing something
new either in plan, color or material? Have I any moral or
legal right to plant on
my lot anything that is liable to spread or injure the cemetery?
Should I not try to keep
my lot free from weeds and covered with a good, lawn turf? If a
trustee, to a great extent
legally and morally responsible for the cemetery, should I not
try to see that our funds
are collected and safely invested, that the most pressing needs
of the cemetery, like our
spreading weeds, be studied and the interest of funds received
from wills and sales of
lots be every year wisely expended? Should not I visit or learn
about other cemeteries and
try, as far as our means will permit to make The South
Onondaga Cemetery a credit,
and not a shame or disgrace, to the past, present and future
generations that loving
relatives and friends have laid or will there lay at rest.
This pamphlet has been compiled
from the maps, records, etc., fearing that some of the
facts may be lost if not
multiplied by providing for lot owners this printed kind of
deed or record of these
lots, records and history; and also in the fond hope that some
few in this or the next
generation will he hereby informed and stimulated to carry
forward the much needed
works of improvement.
POSTSCRIPTS.
1. Can we not have
an Onondaga County Cemetery Association, meeting annually or
semi-annually in Syracuse
or in villages where cemeteries can be examined and papers
and addresses he heard?
2. Asa L. Merrick,
Architect, of Syracuse proposes to give the trustees of our cemetery
a sum the annual interest
of which will be sufficient for the care of his grandfather's
lot in our cemetery, as
well as a larger sum for the care of the Merrick lot in Oakwood.
Who else will follow this
laudable example?
3. At least four cemeteries
in the town of Onondaga are organized under recent laws,
while our own and St. Agnes
are in care of church corporations. What are the advantages
and disadvantages of each
form of control?
4. Please save this
pamphlet for future use for yourself and family.