Brought to you by the Mississippi Project - American Local History
Network
NATCHEZ MASSACRE 1729
|
The massacre began on Monday, the 28th day of November, 1729, about
nine o'clock in the morning. Relations with the warlike and subtle tribe of
the Natchez had been strained ever since the French post had been
established at Natchez in 1716. Preliminary murders by the INdians,
followed by swift retribution on the part of the French, prevented any
lasting peace. In 1723 the first general outbreak of the Indians had
occurred and Bienville quelled it with "characteristic severity". The
misconduct, cupidity and injustice of some of the French commanders,
particularly Chopart, inflamed the savages with hatred and a desire for
revenge, with the result that in one day the Natchez massacred most of the
settlers among them. In the very early times the Natchez were reputed to
have been a very numerous people, counting some sixty villages and eleven
suns. On the other hand, the French, at Natchez, were a small and
comparatively helpless band in comparison with the Indians; their garrison
at Fort Rosalie was small and the planters were living on isolated
farms.
In Claiborne's History, p. 23, foot-note, it is stated: "The
French, under concessions granted by the king, had, at the time of the
massacre, several extensive and well improved plantations around Natchez,
particularly on St. Catherine's extending form the present Washington
road, down said creek, on both sides, to the Woodville road. There was a
plantation, near the mouth of Cole's creek; one or two on Bayou Pierre,
and at Walnut Hills, and quite a settlement around Fort St. Peter, on the
Yazoo. Nearly all the occupants perished at the time of the massacre. The
few that escaped, made their way to New Orleans. It is remarkable that
their claims, which were unquestionably valid, and would, doubtless, have
been recognized by either the Spanish or British government, were never
presented."
The Natchez gained entrance to the fort by a stratagem
and the historic massacre began. It is probable that there was an
agreement between the Natchez and the Chickasaws, Yasous, and other
confederate tribes, to make a joint attack on the French, on a certain day
- all to share in the distribution of the booty. The design was doubtless
hastened by the requirement of Chopart, commandant of Fort Rosalie, that
White Apple Village, on Second Creek, about 12 miles from Natchez, should
be abandoned, so that it, with its surrounding fields, might be converted
into a French plantation; and the Natchez were tempted also to anticipate
the day agreed upon by the arrival of a number of richly laden boats for
the garrison adn the colonists.
Father le Petit, whose account of
the massacre, is perhaps as reliable as any, says
"First they
divided themselves, and sent into the fort, into the village, and into the
two grants, as many Indians as there were French in each of these places;
then they feigned that they were going out for a grand hunt and undertook
to trade with the French for guns, powder and ball, offering to pay them
as much, and even more than was customary, and in truth, as there was no
reason to suspect their fidelity, they made at that time an exchange of
their poultry and corn, for some arms and ammunition whcih they used
advantageously against us. They had been on their guard at Tchactas
(Choctaws), but as for the Natchez, they never distrusted them. Having
thus posted themselves in different houses, provided with the arms
obtained form us, they attacked at the same time each his man and in less
than two hours they massacred more than two hundred of the French. The
best known are Father du Poisson, M. de Chopart, commander of the post, M.
du Codere, commander among the Yasous, M. des Ursins, Messieurs de Kolly
and son, Messieurs de Longrays, des Noyers, Bailly, etc. . . . These
barbarians spared but two of the French, a tailor and a carpenter, who
were able to serve their wants. They did not treat badly either the Negro
slaves, or the INdians who were willing to give themselves up; but they
ripped up the belly of every pregnant woman, and killed almost all those
who were nursing their children, because they were disturbed by their
cries and tears. They did not kill the other women, but made them their
slaves . . . . During the massacre, the Sun, or the great chief of the
Natchez, was seated quietly under teh tobacco shed of the company. His
warriors brought to his feet the head of the commander, about which they
ranged those of the principal French of the post, leaving their bodies a
prey to the dogs, the buzzards, and other carnivorous birds. The Tchactas,
and the other Indians being engaged in the plot with them, they felt at
their ease, and id not at all fear they would draw on themselves the
vengeance which was merited by their cruelty and perfidy."
Writers have been fond of portraying the Natchez as the most
civilized of all the southern tribes of Indians, but there is little or
nothing to warrant the picture. They occupied a region highly favored by
soil and climate, which may have given them a more permanent habitat than
other tribes; but there was nothing in their religion, architecture, or
mode of life to set them above or apart from many other Indian tribes.
They were sun worshippers and believed that their hereditary chiefs were
descended from the sun, a belief prevailing among many other tribes -
notably the Choctaws and Hurons. if they relied more on agriculture, and
less on hunting and fishing, for the means of subsistence, the fertile
area occupied by them, will readily account for it. Their religion was in
the highest degree primitive and brutal. Says Charlevoix:
"When
this Great CHief, or the Woman Chief dies, all their Allouez or guards,
are obliged to follow them into the other world; but they are not the only
persons who have this honor; for so it is reckoned among them, and is
greatly sought after. The death of a chief sometimes costs the lives of
more than a hundred persons; and I have been assured that very few
principal persons of the Natchez die, without being escorted to the
country of souls by some of their relations, their friends, or their
servants."
The horrible ceremonies attendant on human sacrifices
have been frequently detailed by early writers. Their idea of a future
life was sufficiently crude. The good enjoyed a perpetual feast of green
corn, venison and melons, and the bad were condemned to a diet of
alligators and spoiled fish. The chiefs of teh Natchez bore the name of
Suns and the head chief was called the Great Sun. He was always succeeded
by the son of the woman most nearly related to him. This woman had the
title of Woman Chief, and though she did not meddle with the government,
she was paid great honors. Like the great chief, she also had the power of
life and death.
"The government was an absolute despotism. The
supreme chief was master of their labor, their property and their lives.
he never labored and when he needed provisions he issued invitations for a
feast, and all the principal inhabitants were required to attend, and to
bring supplies sufficient for the entertainment and for the support of the
royal family, until he chose to proclaim another festival." (Claiborne, p.
24.)
The Natchez were divided into two classes, that of the
nobility, and that of the common people, called 'Stinkards." While they
understood one another, their dialects were different. When Charlevoix saw
the great village of the Natchez, it consisted of only a few cabins, and
he explained its small size by the statement that the savages, from whom
the great chief had the right to take all they had, got as far from him as
they could.
He has left us a vivid picture of the village and its
royal dwelling and temple. There is certainly no evidence of a higher
civilization portrayed. The temple is built of the same crude materials as
the other cabins, only larger. Inside, he "Never saw anything more
slovenly and dirty, nor more in disorder . . . . We see nothing in their
outward appearance that distinguishes them from the other savages of
Canada and Louisiana. They seldom make war, not placing their glory in
destroying men. What distinguishes them more particularly, is the form of
their government, entirely despotic; a great dependence, which extends
even to a kind of slavery, in the subjects; more pride and grandeur in the
chiefs, and their pacific spirit, which, however, they have not entirely
preserved for some years past."
On December 11, the Yasous
treacherously murdered the missionary priest, Father Souel; and the
following day the Chevalier des ches, who commanded the post among the
Yasous in the absence of M. de Codere, and teh seventeen men of the
garrison were all massacred by this tribe, the lives of the few women and
children being spared.
On receipt of the news of this great
catastrophe to the French, the governor general, Perrier, at New Orleans,
sent Chevalier Lubois, with a small army to exterminate the Natchez.
Perrier secured the cooperation of the powerful tribe of Choctaws, as well
as the Tonikas and some smaller tribes. The Natchez were fiercely attacked
and besieged in their two forts. A truce resulted after seven days, adn
teh Natchez surrendered the prisoners in their hands, in consideration of
the withdrawal of seven pieces of cannon by the French. The Natchez
finally fled across the Mississippi and intrenched themselves near Red
river; they were pursued by the French and compelled to surrender in the
year 1731. Their children and women were reduced to slavery; some of the
warriors took refuge among the Chickasaws, but the Great Sun, St. Cosme,
with several hundred prisoners, were taken to new Orleans and, by order of
the prime minister, Maurepas, sold as slaves and shipped to St. Domingo,
and the proceeds were turned into the Colonial treasury to pay the
expenses of the war.
See also Massacre
at Fort Rosalie - Adams County ALHN site - with a listing of those
slain!
Copyright 2000, 2001 State
Coordinator Mississippi American Local History Network, Inc., a
non-profit public benefit corporation
Page prepared
and designed by Ginny Walker
English
This nonprofit research site is a
USGenNet CertifiedSafe-Site™ and affiliate of the American History Local
Network, Inc. (ALHN). Web hosting is generously provided by USGenNet, a
nonprofit, tax-exempt public benefit corporation. This site makes no claim
to the copyrights of individual submitters, and is in full compliance with
with USGenNet's Conditions of Use.
| |