See also

Family of John + VINTON and Ann + MOORE

Husband: John + VINTON (1619-1664)
Wife: Ann + MOORE (1622-1664)
Children: Eleanor VINTON (1648- )
John + VINTON (1650-1727)
William VINTON (1652- )
Blaise VINTON (1654- )
Ann VINTON (1656- )
Elizabeth VINTON (1657- )
Sarah VINTON (1662- )
Marriage 1646 Lynn, Essex, MA, US1,2

Husband: John + VINTON

Name: John + VINTON
Sex: Male
Father: Robert + VINTON (1595- )
Mother: Jane + STONE (1600- )
Birth 1619 Canterbury, Kent, England
Baptism 24 Oct 1619 (age 0)3
Bishops Stortford, Herfordshire, England
Death 3 Aug 1664 (age 44-45) Lynn, Essex, MA, US

Wife: Ann + MOORE

Name: Ann + MOORE
Sex: Female
Father: George + MOORE (1563- )
Mother: Elizabeth + CLARKE (1586- )
Birth 1622 Lynn, Essex, MA, US
Death 3 Aug 1664 (age 41-42) New Haven, New Haven, CT, US

Child 1: Eleanor VINTON

Name: Eleanor VINTON
Sex: Female
Birth May 1648

Child 2: John + VINTON

picture

Spouse: Hannah + GREEN

Name: John + VINTON
Sex: Male
Spouse: Hannah + GREEN (1660-1741)
Birth 2 Mar 1650 Lynn, Essex, MA, US4,5
Occupation forgeman
Death 13 Nov 1727 (age 77) Woburn, Middlesex, MA, US

Child 3: William VINTON

Name: William VINTON
Sex: Male
Birth 1652

Child 4: Blaise VINTON

Name: Blaise VINTON
Sex: Male
Birth 22 Apr 1654

Child 5: Ann VINTON

Name: Ann VINTON
Sex: Female
Birth 4 Apr 1656

Child 6: Elizabeth VINTON

Name: Elizabeth VINTON
Sex: Female
Birth Jan 1657

Child 7: Sarah VINTON

Name: Sarah VINTON
Sex: Female
Birth 16 Sep 1662

Note on Husband: John + VINTON

JOHN VINTON — was the ancestor of all persons bearing the name

of Vinton in the United States of America, according to the best of my

knowledge and belief.* My information respecting him is very lim-

ited. I know not when or where he was born ; when or where he

died ; what was his occupation, or what his position in society. He

must have been born on the other side of the Atlantic ; but on which

side of the English channel, it is impossible to determine with cer-

tainty. As he was a young man in 1648, the probability is that he was

born not far from 1620. As a portion of the Vinton family remained

in England, it may be a fair conclusion that his father, or grandfather,

came over from France, and settled on the eastern shores of the island.

This may have been about 1625, or at a still earlier date.

 

Nor should the obscurity in which his origin and early history is

involved be thought strange. We have the names of all the men who

landed on the Rock of Plymouth in 1620 ; nothing is better known at

present than that whole transaction ; but Winslow, Brewster, and Brad-

ford are the only passengers in the Mayflower who have been traced to

an European birthplace. How few attempts have been successful to

connect beyond any doubt an American with an English ancestor !

Most of the compilers of our Genealogical Memoirs are obliged to stop

this side of the great water. From the nature of the case, it must be

so ; a different result ought not to be expected. If, as we suppose, our

first American progenitor was the son of a poor French refugee, forced

by religious persecution to abandon his native land and take up his

abode among strangers; the absence of all record, the entire lack of

documentary information, is precisely what ought to be expected. And

such is the fact.

 

The date of his arrival in this country, I have taken much pains to

ascertain ; but without success. I think it must have been previous to

1643, for then the emigration from England almost wholly ceased. I

find him first at Lynn, near Boston, in the year 1648, when his first

child was born. His name then occurs in a Record of Births and Mar-

riages in Lynn, which I found — the original — in the office of the City

 

* It is obvious ihat from this statement must be excepted a few persons who may have

emigrated to this country within a few years past, as noticed p. 5.

 

 

 

12 THE VINTON MEMORIAL.

 

Clerk, Salem. This — which is the County Record — is collateral with

Records of Births, Marriages, and Deaths, in Salem, Gloucester, and

other towns in the Southern portion of the County of Essex, during the

early years of the Colony.

 

His name does not occur in the List of those who were admitted

Freemen of the Colony from 1628 to 1692.* This deficiency seems

to necessitate the inference that he was not a member of any Congre-

gational Church. Yet there were many respectable and even influen-

tial men in the colony — nay, some, I think, who held office, — who were

neither freemen nor church-members. His foreign descent may have

occasioned some inconvenience, some disadvantage, which might not

exist at a later period. The connection of his family with the family

of Joseph Hills — to be noticed in the sequel — would indicate that he

was a respectable man.

 

After extensive and diligent search, I find no record of any distribu-

tion of land to him, or any conveyance of land to or by him. Nor do

I find any Will of his, or any Record of Administration on his Estate.

It would not be safe, however, to conclude that he owned no land in

Lynn or elsewhere. The book is lost in which were recorded the

names of the original proprietors of land in Lynn. Mr. Alonzo Lewis,

the historian of Lynn — who has given my ancestor's name a place in

his valuable work under date of 1650, — informs me that few, if any,

of the present inhabitants of Lynn can produce any original title to

their lands. John Vinton, we know, resided in Lynn twenty years or

more ; it is almost certain, therefore, that he was a land-owner. In

those early days, land was divided among all the inhabitants, usually in

proportion to the number of children in a man's family. | The Record

of such a distribution would of course be made and kept by some Town

Officer. Yet in many cases the Record has long since perished. Such

is the fact in Lynn ; and not only so, the earliest Town Records, and

Church Records, too, of Lynn are none of them now to be found. The

Record of Births, Marriages, and Deaths, now in the City Clerk's Office

in Lynn, does not begin till 1675. Records of Town business are not

extant earlier than March, 1706-7. § The fact is similar, or rather

worse, with regard to Maiden. The Town Records of Maiden previous

to 1700, with the exception of a few scraps following 1678, are utterly

lost.

 

In view of these things, it cannot seem strange that our knowledge

of our first American ancestor is so deficient.

 

There is one item of information, however, furnished by the files of

the County Court papers in Salem. The Record is as follows: "At a

Quarterly Court held at Salem, 7 m°. [Sept.] 1649, John Vinton and his

wife were presented for scolding and opprobrious words to their neigh-

bours ; fined 5 shillings."

 

* This Record may be imperfect, as most of our early Records are.

 

t See Appendix A.

 

^ I liave made these statements on the strength of the information I received from the

City Clerk of Lynn, tind llev. Parsons (/ooke, pastor uf the first Chnrch in thai city. Mr.

Lewis [Hist, of l.ynn,] fjoes (urtlipr and says : ?' the Town Records ot Lvnii lor the first 1)2

years (IG2 -\)\) arc whully wanting. The earhest Record of the proceedings of the 'I'owii

whicii has becu discovered, commences in tlie year IG9I, and tiie carli' si Parish Record in

lltZ."

 

 

 

FIRST GENERATION. 13

 

The first impression given by tliis record is not favorable. But when

the difference between those times and ours is considered ; when we

reflect that offences, now deemed venial, and which would now be

passed over without notice, were then objects of legal animadversion ;

when we remember that punishments were at that time often arbitrarily

inflicted, and that some of the worthiest men in the colony were

severely fined for indulging in freedom of speech ; * moderation and

lenity in the administration of government being scarcely known any-

where ; we may safely conclude that the record just quoted raises no

just suspicion against the character of our ancestor. The offence could

not have been flagrant, as the fine was so light. The Record corrobo-

rates the probability that John Vinton and his wife were exiles, or the

children of exiles, from France. Imperfectly acquainted with the Eng-

lish language and usages, and destitute of many outward advantages,

they might be specially liable to injury and imposition from their neigh-

bors ; and this might occasion " scolding " on their part. I dare say I

should have done the same thing in their circumstances. Till better

informed as to the cause of the altercation, I shall think no worse of

them for the fact.

 

How long the Vinton family continued at Lynn cannot now be deter-

mined. It seems probable that John Vinton, the original emigrant, did

not attain an advanced age. There is some reason to think that he

removed to Maiden, an adjoining town, with his family, about 1676.

His sons John and Blaise appear in Court at Salem in 1675 ; this indi-

cates residence in Lynn. John, his son, was of Maiden in 1677, the

time of his marriage. Sarah, his youngest daughter, appears at a Court

in Middlesex County, in which Maiden was situated, in June 1681. A

daughter of Joseph Hills, of Maiden, one of the most respectable men

in the colony, married a son of the Vinton family, probably between

1675 and 1680. These things seem to indicate a residence of our first

American progenitor in Maiden later than 1675; but the contemporary

Records of that town having perished, there is no decisive evidence of

the fact.

 

Eleanor, the eldest child, having entered the married state in 1666,

continued at Lynn with her husband ; and probably may have descend-

ants there at the present day. But from the removal of the family of

her father from that place to the present time, no record appears of any

person bearing the name of Vinton in Lynn. It would seem, indeed,

that the abode of the Vinton family in Lynn did not extend beyond

some thirty years, terminating about 1675.

 

Mr. Alonzo Lewis, the historian of Lynn, informed me in July 1853,

that a certain hill in Lynn is to this day called " Vinton's Hill,"

 

As already remarked, there is no record of any will of John Vinton

 

* Rev. George Phillips, Elder Richard Brown and others, of Watertown, were arraigned

before the Governor in 1632, for freely expressing their minds in relation to the conduct of

the Governor and Assistants, who had passed an order to tax the people without their con-

sent. But these were among the best men in the Colony. And it is evident that they were

in the right, while the Governor was greatly in the wrong. Captain William Jennison of the

same place, a little later, was also arraigned for privately expressing his opinion on public

affairs. John Oldham was banished from Plymouth in 1G24 for the free expression of his

opinion on Church Government ; a man of great worth of character. Winlhrop and Hub-

bard speak of Brown's " violent spirit"; Morton calls Oldham " extremely passionate "—

when iheir only offence was a resolute stand against arbitrary power.

 

 

 

14 THE VINTON MEMORIAL.

 

of Lynn, or of any administration on his estate. If he died during the

tyrannical government of Andros, 1686-9, when, as I suppose, many

wills failed of being recorded, this may be the reason. Yet of many

prominent and wealthy men in the colony, even at a much later date,

no will or settlement of estate, can now be found.

 

The wife of John Vinton was Ann .

 

His children, all born, doubtless, in Lynn, were —

 

2. tEleanor, b. May , 1C48 ; m. Isaac Eamsdell, of Ljiin, July 12, 1666.

 

3. tJohn, b. March 2, 1650; m. Hannah Green, of Maiden, Aug. 26, 1677.

 

4. t William, b. last of April, 1652; m. dau. of Joseph Hills, of Maiden.

 

5. tBlaise, b. April 22, 1654.

 

6. Ann, b. April 4, 1656.

 

7. Elizabeth, b. January 1657-8.

 

8. Sarah, b. Sept. 16, 1662.

 

The Record in regard to the last child reads — " his daughter Sarah,

born by Ann, his wife," which is not said of the others ; and this omis-

sion, with the increased interval of time between her birth and that of

the preceding child, may leave it uncertain whether " Ann, his wife,"

was the mother of the first six children.

Sources

1"US and International Marriage Records, 1550-1900" (on-line, Yates Publishing, Provo, UT).
2"US New England Marriages prior to 1700".
3"England and Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906" (On line - Provo, UT).
4"MA Town Birth Records" (on-line, Provo, UT).
5"MA Town and Vital Records 1620-1988 Record".