AMERICA THE GREAT MELTING POT
Contact information on HOME page
Direct descendant is highlighted in red
John Clark | see FAMILY TREE | |
Born: 1645 Hartford Settlement, Connecticut Colony
|
||
Married: 1675 Hartford, CT
|
||
Died: 26 Jul 1731 Middletown Village, Hartford, CT | Barbour Collection John, Serg., d. July 26, 1731 |
WIFE
CHILDREN
1. Nathaniel Clark b. 18 Apr 1676
2. John Clark b. 14 Jun 1677
3. Daniel Clark b. 30 Aug 1680
4. Elizabeth Clark b. 03 Apr 1685
5. Mary Clark b. 03 Apr 1691
6. Sarah Clark b. 08 Sep 1692
7. White Clark b. 04 Nov 1693
8. Mary Clark b. 04 May 1695
From Salter S. Clark, "A Few Genealogical Items Connected with the Family
Descended from William Clark, One of the Original Settlers of Haddam, Conn." [as
reported by Jane Devlin]:
John, the son of William, went to Middletown, Conn., probably between 1675 and
1680, and married Elizabeth, the daughter of Captain Nathaniel WHITE, of
Middletown. Among the early records of Middletown is one as follows: "March 21,
1680. Land of John CLARKE of Middletown in the county of Hartford & Collony of
Conoctocutt Recorded to him & two his heirs forever .. [among other parcels] One
parcell of meadow land which he bought of Townehashquesuncksqua lying on the
east side of the Great River at Wongonk" [now Portland].
This John Clark probably lived in Middletown until his death, which occurred
July 26, 1731. He was called "Sergeant", more often "Senior," and appears to
have been a man of standing and property, his name occurring often in the land
records.
++++
Elizabeth, the mother, died Dec 25, 1711, aged 56. Elizabeth, the daughter,
married Ebenezer SELDEN, of Hadley. About 1720 "Sergeant" John gave a homestead
to each of his three sons, the one given to his son John being the ""homestead
whereon the said father and said son John now dwelleth ... containing 13 acres,
"which was in the "North Parish" of the town, on the west side of the
Connecticut River. A year prior to his death he had also conveyed to his son
John 161 acres of land at Haddam. This land had been conveyed to the father,
John, by his brother Thomas, and in the deed their "honored father, William
CLARK of Hadam, deceased," is spoken of.
Sergeant John and Lieutenant Thomas both sign their deeds with a mark.
Nathaniel, John, & Daniel, the sons of Sergeant John, married and had children
at Middletown.
---------
Great Migration begins
ORIGIN: Unknown
MIGRATION: 1633
FIRST RESIDENCE: Cambridge
REMOVES: Hartford 1636
CHURCH MEMBERSHIP: Admission to Cambridge church prior to 6 May 1635 implied by
freemanship.
FREEMAN: 6 May 1635 [MBCR 1:370].
OFFICES: Hogreeve, Cambridge, 5 December 1636 [CaTR 24].
Connecticut jury, 2 September 1641, 14 October 1642 [CCCR 1:66; RPCC 15, 17].
Served in the Pequot War (implied by his grant of land in the Soldier's Field in
Hartford).
ESTATE: Granted one rood for a cowyard in Cambridge, 5 August 1633 [CaTR 5];
granted two acres in Westend, 4 August 1634 [CaTR 9]. In the 8 February 1635/6
list of those in Cambridge with houses, John Clark had one in the Westend [CaTR
18].
In the Cambridge Book of Possessions, on [5] September 1635, "John Clarke" held
five parcels: [worn] acres in West End; one [worn] in Cowyard Lane; one acre
[and] one rood in Old Field; three acres on Small Lot Hill; and [worn] acres in
the Great Marsh [CaBOP 17-18]. In 1639 Edward Winship held "one house with two
acres of land upon the Cow Common" which he had purchased of John Clark [CaBOP
56].
In the Hartford land inventory of February 1639 "John Clerke" held twelve
parcels: four acres "on which his dwelling house now standeth with yards or
gardens therein"; one rood and twenty perches in the Little Meadow; one rood in
the Soldier's Field; one acre and eight perches on the east side of the Great
River; two roods and twenty-five perches in the North Meadow; five acres, three
roods and thirty-nine perches of meadow and swamp in the North Meadow; three
acres of swamp on the east side of the Great River; fourteen acres in the Little
Oxpasture; six acres in the Cowpasture; two acres, two roods and twelve perches
in the neck of land part of which he received from Nathaniel Ely by exchange;
two acres on the east side of the Great River; and eleven acres, three roods and
twelve perches in the Cowpasture [HaBOP 197-99].
BIRTH: By about 1612 based on grant of land in Cambridge.
DEATH: After 1642.
MARRIAGE: None recorded.
CHILDREN: None recorded.
COMMENTS: Much has been written on this John Clark, and many genealogists have
concluded that he resided in succession in Cambridge, Hartford, Saybrook and
Milford (with a possible brief stay in Norwich between Saybrook and Milford).
The three most important summaries of his life are those by Louis Effingham
DeForest [Moore Anc 187-95], Mary Walton Ferris [Dawes-Gates 2:201-05] and
Donald Lines Jacobus [Granberry 194-96].
Although there is no record which explicitly states that the John Clark of
Cambridge is the same as the John Clark of Hartford, there is no record of the
man in Cambridge after the spring of 1636, and almost the entire population of
Cambridge moved to Hartford in 1635 and 1636. The John Clark of Saybrook is
determined to be the John Clark of Milford since the latter mentions extensive
land in Saybrook in his will.
The problem comes with the connection between Hartford and Saybrook. John Clark
appears in Saybrook at about the time that records for John Clark in Hartford
cease, and William Pratt, son-in-law of John Clark of Saybrook-Milford, had
resided in Hartford before moving to Saybrook. There is no direct evidence
making the connection, and a number of circumstances causing doubt.
The John Clark who resided in Cambridge and Hartford served once as a hogreeve
and twice as a juror. The John Clark of Saybrook and Milford served repeatedly
as deputy to the Connecticut court and held other high offices. None of the
records for the John Clark of Cambridge and Hartford indicates that he had a
wife or children.
This position may be excessively cautious, and it may be that these records do
all apply to one man, in which case the sources cited above should be consulted
(although there are differences between them). For the moment we recommend
further research and analysis directed toward resolving the problem one way or
another.