The First Census of the United States
(1790) comprised an enumeration of the inhabitants of the present states
of Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia.
A complete
set of the schedules for each state, with a summary for the counties, and
in many cases for towns, was filed in the State Department, but unfortunately
they are not now complete, the returns for the states of Delaware, Georgia,
Kentucky, New Jersey, Tennessee, and Virginia having been destroyed when
the British burned the Capitol at Washington during the War of 1812.
These schedules form a unique inheritance
for the Nation, since they represent for each of the states concerned a
complete list of the heads of families in the United States at the time
of the adoption of the Constitution. The framers were the statesmen and
leaders of thought, but those whose names appear upon the schedules of
the First Census were in general the plain citizens who by their conduct
in war and peace made the Constitution possible and by their intelligence
and self-restraint put it into successful operation.
The total population of the United
States in 1790, exclusive of slaves, as derived from the schedules, was
3,231,533. The only names appearing upon the schedules, however, were those
of heads of families, and as at that period the families averaged 6 persons,
the total number was approximately 540,000, or slightly more than half
a million. The number of names which is now lacking because of the destruction
of the schedules is approximately 140,000, thus leaving schedules containing
about 400,000 names.
The information contained in the published
report of the First Census of the United States, a small volume of 56 pages,
was not uniform for the several states and territories. For New England
and one or two of the other states the population was presented by counties
and towns, that of New Jersey appeared partly by counties and towns and
partly by counties only; in other cases the returns were given by counties
only. Thus the complete transcript of the names of heads of families, with
accompanying formation, would present for the first time detailed information
as to the number of inhabitants - males, females, etc. - for each minor
civil division in all those states for which such information was not originally
published.
In response to repeated requests from
patriotic societies and persons interested in genealogy, or desirous of
studying the early history of the United States, Congress added to the
sundry civil appropriation bill for the fiscal year 1907 the following
paragraph:
The Director of the Census is hereby
authorized and directed to publish in a permanent form, by counties and
minor civil divisions, the names of the heads of families returned at the
First Census of the United States in seventeen hundred and ninety; and
the Director of the Census is authorized, in his discretion, to sell said
publications, the proceeds thereof to be covered into the Treasury of the
United States, to be deposited to the credit of miscellaneous receipts
on account of "Proceeds of sales of Government property.
Provided, That no expense shall be
incurred hereunder additional to appropriations for the Census Office for
printing therefor made for the fiscal year nineteen hundred and seven;
and the Director of the Census is hereby directed to report to Congress
at its next session the cost incurred hereunder and the price fixed for
said publications and the total received therefor.
The amount of money appropriated by
Congress for the Census printing for the fiscal year mentioned was unfortunately
not sufficient to meet the current requirement of the Office and to publish
the transcription of the First Census, and no provision was made in the
sundry civil appropriation bill for 1908 for the continuance of authority
to publish these important records beyond the present fiscal year. Resources,
however, are available for publishing a small section of the work, and
the schedules of New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maryland have been selected.
In these states the names of heads of families in 1790 were limited in
number, and the records are in a condition which makes transcription comparatively
easy. In the following pages all the information is presented which appears
upon these schedules, and the sequence of the names is that followed by
the enumerator in making his report.
It is to be hoped that Congress will
again grant authority and money for the publication of the remaining schedules,
in order that the entire series, so far as it exists, may be complete.
For several of the states for which schedules are lacking it is probable
that the Director of the Census could obtain lists which would present
the names of most of the heads of families at the date of the First Census.
In Virginia, for example, a state enumeration was made in 1785, of which
some of the original schedules are still in existence. These would be likely
to prove a reasonably satisfactory substitute for the Federal list made
five years later.
The First Census act was passed at
the second session of the First Congress, and was signed by President Washington
on March 1, 1790. The task of making the first enumeration of inhabitants
was placed upon the President. Under this law the marshals of the several
judicial districts were required to ascertain the number of inhabitants
within their respective districts, omitting Indians not taxed, and distinguishing
free persons (including those bound to service for a term of years); the
sex and color of free persons; and the number of free males 16 years of
age and over.
The object of the inquiry last mentioned
was, undoubtedly, to obtain definite knowledge as to the military and industrial
strength of the country. This fact possesses special interest, because
the Constitution directs merely an enumeration of inhabitants. Thus the
demand for increasingly extensive information, which has been so marked
a characteristic of census legislation, began with the First Congress that
dealt with the subject.
The method followed by the President
in putting into operation the First Census law, although the object of
extended investigation, is not definitely known. It is supposed that the
President or the Secretary of State dispatched copies of the law, and perhaps
of instructions also, to the marshals. There is, however, some ground for
disputing this conclusion. At least one of the reports in the census volume
of 1790 was furnished by a governor. This, together with the fact that
there is no record of correspondence with the marshals on the subject of
the census, but that there is a record of such correspondence with the
governors, makes very strong the inference that the marshals received their
instructions through the governors of the states. This inference is strengthened
by the fact that in 1790 the state of Massachusetts furnished the printed
blanks, and also by the fact that the law relating to the Second Census
specifically charged the Secretary of State to superintend the enumeration
and to communicate directly with the marshals.
By the terms of the First Census law
nine months were allowed in which to complete the enumeration. The census
taking was supervised by the marshals of the several judicial districts,
who employed assistant marshals to act as enumerators. There were 17 marshals.
The records showing the number of assistant marshals employed in 1790,
1800, and 1810 were destroyed by fire, but the number employed in 1790
has been estimated at 650.
The schedules which these officials
prepared consist of lists of names of heads of families; each name appears
in a stub, or first column, which is followed by five columns, giving details
of the family. These columns are headed as follows:
-
Free white males,
16 years and upward, including heads of families.
-
Free white males
under 16 years.
-
Free white females,
including heads of families.
-
All other free
persona.
-
Slaves.
The assistant marshals made two copies
of the returns; in accordance with the law one copy was posted in the immediate
neighborhood for the information of the public, and the other was transmitted
to the marshal in charge, to be forwarded to the President. The schedules
were turned over by the President to the Secretary of State. Little or
no tabulation was required, and the report of the First Census, as also
the reports of the Second, Third, and Fourth, was produced without the
employment of any clerical force, the summaries being transmitted directly
to the printer. The total population as returned in 1790 was 3,929,214,
and the entire cost of the census was $44,377.
A summary
of the results of the First Census, not including the returns for South
Carolina, was transmitted to Congress by President Washington on October
27, 1791. The legal period for enumeration, nine months, had been extended,
the longest time consumed being eighteen months in South Carolina. The
report of October 27 was printed in full, and published in what is now
a very rare little volume; afterwards the report for South Carolina was
"tipped in." To contain the results of the Twelfth Census, ten large
quarto volumes, comprising in all 10,400 pages, were required. No illustration
of the expansion of census inquiry can be more striking.
The original schedules of the First
Census are now contained in 26 bound volumes, preserved in the Census Office.
For the most part the headings of the schedules were written in by hand.
Indeed, up to and including 1820, the assistant marshals generally used
for the schedules such paper as they happened to have, ruling it, writing
in the headings, and binding the sheets together themselves. In some cases
merchants account paper was used, and now and then the schedules were bound
in wall paper.
As a consequence of requiring marshals
to supply their own blanks, the volumes containing the schedules vary in
size from about 7 inches long, 3 inches wide, and 1/2 inch thick to 21
inches long, 14 inches wide, and 6 inches thick. Some of the sheets in
these volumes are only 4 inches long, but a few are 3 feet in length, necessitating
several folds. In some cases leaves burned at the edges have been covered
with transparent silk to preserve them.
In March, 1790, the Union consisted
of twelve states: Rhode Island, the last of the original thirteen to enter
the Union, being admitted May 29. Vermont, the first addition, was admitted
in the following year, before the results of the First Census were announced.
Maine was a part of Massachusetts, Kentucky was a part of Virginia, and
the present states of Alabama and Mississippi were parts of Georgia. The
present states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin, with
part of Minnesota, were known as the Northwest Territory, and the present
state of Tennessee, then a part of North Carolina, was soon to be organized
as the Southwest Territory.
The United States was bounded on the
west by the Mississippi river, beyond which stretched that vast and unexplored
wilderness belonging to the Spanish King, which was afterwards ceded to
the United States by France as the Louisiana Purchase, and now comprises
the great and populous states of Louisiana, Arkansas, Indian Territory,
Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota,
and Montana, and most of Colorado, Wyoming and Minnesota. The Louisiana
Purchase was not completed for more than a decade after the First Census
was taken. On the south was another Spanish colony known as the Floridas.
Texas, then a part of the colony of Mexico, belonged to Spain; and California,
Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico, also the property of Spain, although penetrated
here and there by venturesome explorers and missionaries, were, for the
most part, an undiscovered wilderness.
The gross area of the United States
was 827,844 square miles, but the settled area was only 239,935 square
miles, or about 29 per cent of the total. Though the area covered by the
enumeration in 1790 seems very small when compared with the present area
of the United States, the difficulties
which confronted the census taker were vastly greater than in 1900. In
many localities there were no roads, and where these did exist they were
poor and frequently impassable; bridges were almost unknown. Transportation
was entirely by horseback, stage, or private coach. A journey as long as
that from New York to Washington was a serious undertaking, requiring eight
days under the most favorable conditions Western New York was a wilderness,
Elmira and Binghamton being but detached hamlets. The territory west of
the Allegheny mountains, with the exception of a portion of Kentucky, was
unsettled and scarcely penetrated. Detroit and Vincennes were too small
and isolated to merit consideration. Philadelphia was the capital of the
United States. Washington was a mere Government project, not even named,
but known as the Federal City. Indeed, by the spring of 1793, only one
wall of the White House had been constructed, and the site for the Capitol
had been merely surveyed. New York city in 1790 possessed a population
of only 33,131, although it was the largest city in the United States;
Philadelphia was second, with 28,522; and Boston third, with 18,320. Mails
were transported in very irregular fashion, and correspondence was expensive
and uncertain.
There were, moreover, other difficulties
which were of serious moment in 1790, but which long ago ceased to be problems
in census taking. The inhabitants, having no experience with census taking,
imagined that some scheme for increasing taxation was involved, and were
inclined to be cautious lest they should reveal too much of their own affairs.
There was also opposition to enumeration on religious grounds, a count
of inhabitants being regarded by many as a cause for divine displeasure.
The boundaries of towns and other minor divisions, and even those of counties,
were in many cases unknown or not defined at all. The hitherto semi-independent
states had been under the control of the Federal Government for so short
a time that the different sections had not yet been welded into an harmonious
nationality in which the Federal authority should be unquestioned and instructions
promptly and fully obeyed.
District |
Free
white males of 16 years and upward, including heads of families. |
Free
white males under 16. |
Free
white females, including heads of families. |
All
other free persons. |
Slaves. |
Total |
Vermont
|
22,435
|
22,328
|
40,505
|
255
|
16 *
|
85,530
**
|
New Hampshire
|
36,086
|
34,851
|
70,160
|
630
|
158
|
141,885
|
Maine
|
24,384
|
24.748
|
46,870
|
538
|
None.
|
96,540
|
Massachusetts
|
95,453
|
87,289
|
190,582
|
5,463
|
None.
|
378,787
|
Rhode
Island
|
16,019
|
15,799
|
32,652
|
3,407
|
948
|
68,825
|
Connecticut
|
60,523
|
54,403
|
117,448
|
2,808
|
2,764
|
237,946
|
New York
|
83,700
|
78,122
|
152,320
|
4,654
|
21,324
|
340,120
|
New Jersey
|
45,251
|
41,416
|
83.287
|
2,762
|
11,423
|
184,139
|
Pennsylvania
|
110,788
|
106,948
|
206,363
|
6,537
|
3,737
|
434,373
|
Delaware
|
11,783
|
12,143
|
22,384
|
3,899
|
8,887
|
59,094
***
|
Maryland
|
55,915
|
51,339
|
101,395
|
8,043
|
103,036
|
319,728
|
Virginia
|
110,936
|
116,135
|
215,046
|
12,866
|
292,627
|
747,610
|
Kentucky
|
15,154
|
17,057
|
28,922
|
114
|
12,430
|
73,677
|
North
Carolina
|
69,988
|
77,506
|
140,710
|
4,975
|
100,572
|
393,751
|
South
Carolina
|
35,576
|
37,722
|
66,880
|
1,801
|
107,094
|
249,073
|
Georgia
|
13,103
|
14,044
|
25,739
|
398
|
29,264
|
82,548
|
Total
number of inhabitants of the U.S. exclusive of S. Western and N. Territory.
|
807,094
|
791,850
|
1,541,263
|
59,150
|
694,280
|
3,893,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.W. Territory
|
6,271
|
10,277
|
15,365
|
361
|
3,417
|
35,691
|
N. Territory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The census
of 1790, published in 1791, reports 16 slaves in Vermont. Subsequently,
and up to 1860, the number is given as 17. An examination of the original
manuscript. returns shows that there never were any slaves in Vermont.
The original error occurred in preparing the results for publication, when
16 persons, returned as "Free colored," were classified as "Slave."
** Corrected
figures are 85,425, or 114 less than figures published in 1790, due to
an error of addition in the returns for each of the towns of Fairfield,
Milton Shelburne, and Williston, in the county of Chittenden; Brookfield,
Newbury. Randolph, and Strafford, in the county of Orange; Castleton, Clarendon,
Hubbardton, Poultney, Rutland, Shrewsbury, and Wallingford, in the county
of Rutland; Dummerston, Guilford, Halifax, and Westminster, in the county
of Windham; and Woodstock in the county of Windsor.
*** Corrected
figures are 59,096, or 2 more than figures published in 1790, due to error
in addition. |
|
Transcribed
& prepared by:
Department
of Commerce and Labor
Bureau
of the Census
S. N. D.
North, Director
Washington
Government
Printing Office
1907
|