Campbell Co Tn - Court Records

U. S. Fritts vs Lucinda Fritts 15 Jun 1897

"15 Jun 1897. This cause this day came on to be finally heard and determined. . . upon the bill, judgment proconfesso heretofore regularly taken and entered, and the oral evidence introduced at the hearing, the defendant being represented by counsel, from all which it appears to the court that the defendant is guilty of adultery as charged in the bill and complainant sustaining a good character, is entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the bonds of matrimony subsisting between complainant and respondent be dissolved absolutely, and complainant restored to all the rights of a single and unmarried man, and execution is awarded against him and his surety for the costs. (Circuit Court Minutes, Oct 1895-Oct 1898, p5191.)"

Campbell Co., TN Court Minutes - 1816
David Richardson vs Richard Linville - Appeal
This day came the parties in this cause by their attorneys and thereupon came a jury towit, James G. Magee, John Franklin, Robert Smith, Peter McCulley, Eli Wilson, THOMAS ANDERSON, James McGinney, John Huckaby, Thomas Skidmore, Joshua Roach, Joseph Hood and Geo. Rains, who being elected, tried and sworn the truth to speak, upon the matter of controversy, upon their oaths do say they find for the plaintiff and assess his damages to ten dollars besides cents. Wherefore it is ordered and considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant his damage aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed, also his costs by him about his suit in this behalf expended and the said defendant in mercy & c, and the said Deft, by his attorney comes and prays an appeal from the foregoing indictment, files his reason, enters into bond and security and the appeal is granted.

Note: Richard Linville was sheriff of Campbell Co., TN (Per Campbell Co., TN Court Minutes)

The LaFollette Press
June 8, 1921
LaFollette, Campbell, Tennessee
Source: microfilm, self owned
Page/Column: Pg. 6

For May Term Circuit Court to be Tried at Adjoined Session

Monday, June 27, 1921

M.A. Wheeler v. James P. Keivet

Jay Blankenship vs. Adams Express Company

Diamond Hosiery Mills vs. Southern Express Company

Ellen Hill vs. James P. Scott

A.J. Foust vs. LaFollette Coal & Iron Company

W.E. McCreary vs. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Hugh Ray, Admr., vs. Geo M. and Oscar Richmond

Matt Powers, Adm., vs. Southern Railway Co., Et al

William Baird vs. J.F. Walden

Sillas Smith vs. LaFollette Coal & Iron Co.

L.F. Perkins vs. LaFollette Coal & Iron Co.

J.A. Polston vs. LaFollette Coal & Iron Co.

Walter Perkins vs. LaFollette Coal & Iron Co.

Luther Smith vs. LaFollette Coal & Iron Co.

R.D. Butler vs. James Carr

B.F. Walden vs. J.F. Walden

City of LaFollette vs. James Hampton

P.P. Allen vs. J.F. Walden

J.D. McPhetridge vs. Blain Myers

P.J. Fritz vs. Campbell Coal mining Co.

W.R. Nelson vs. Walter Wilson

Jesse Seibers vs. LaFollette Coal & Iron Co.

S.H. David and wife vs. F.D. Cannon

J.M. Williams, N.F. vs. Miller Lumber Company

Tuesday, June 28, 1921

Frank Gaylor vs. Russell Harwood Lumber Co.

S.J. Terry vs. Southern Railway Company

James Childress vs. R.D. Lynch

E.M. Stephens vs. S.F. Broughton

M.L. Link vs. J.H. Barker

M.C. Kaiser & Co., vs. T.Y. Powers

Charley Cannon by N.F. vs. John Russell, Et al.

S.F. Broughton vs. Italian Blue Gem Coal Mine

Tim O’Conner vs. James Cooper

J.N. Russell vs. Amon Tiller

Sam Rapp vs. Genette Lumber Company

Joel Parrott, Et al., vs. Frank Lindsay

Edith Evans, by N.F. vs. Wayne Chambers

Alice Huley, Admr., vs Louisville & Nashville R.R. Company

Minnie Pierce vs. James Pierce

Obedience Broyles vs. Link Blankenship Etal

William Baird vs. R.D. Davis

B.R. Berry Cantrell vs. J.P. Williams

John Hood vs. Bear Wallow Coal Company

John Sharp vs. R.E. Koontz Etal.

R.E. Koontz vs. Mrs John J. Sharp

William Chapman vs. John Barnette

Frank Schubert vs. George Broyles, Etal.

City of Jellico vs. T.H. King

Rule of Court -No.4

In all civil cases, whether jury of non-jury, parties may continue by consent, provided provision is made for the payment of all the unadjudged costs of the cause. In all cases continued by consent where no provision is made in the agreement for the payment of such costs, all the unadjudged costs of the case will be adjudged equally between the parties.

Signed, XEN HICKS, Judge

A.L. BURKETT, Clerk

Submitted by Misty

Take me to the top of the page

Support The Campbell County Tn. Local History Network