Warren County
Local History by Dallas Bogan |
Contributor: |
Dallas Bogan on 10 August 2004 |
Source: |
original article by Dallas Bogan |
Return to Index to see a list of other articles by Dallas Bogan |
While the finishing touches are being put on the bike and walking trail along
the Little Miami River, I thought an article on the first survey along this
scenic part of the county would be appropriate.
The trail is on the direct path of the most successful railroad in early railroading
history, the Little Miami Railroad.
Ormsby M. Mitchel,
of whom the writer made a report on in one of his earlier articles, made the
survey.
O.M. Mitchel's services were secured at the projection of the
Little Miami Railroad as a surveyor. The railroad was very fortunate to have
such a man as Mitchel.
He was its first civil engineer and a man of scientific distinction. He was
a graduate of West Point and taught mathematics at this institution.
He afterward attained the same position at Cincinnati College in 1836. (We should
keep in mind that Prof. Mitchel was but 23 years of age at
this time.)
The Little Miami Railroad Company was chartered March 11, 1836. Prof.
Mitchel spent his first vacation plotting a practical route for the
railroad. His examination began June 12, 1837; his report of the survey is dated
August 24 of the same year.
The original charter did not stipulate that the railroad was to run along the
Little Miami River, but through the river valley. The terminals were to be Springfield
and Cincinnati; the mid-terminal point was to be Xenia. The road was to run
down the valley of the Little Miami and the Ohio River to a juncture in Cincinnati.
Prof. Mitchel's first examination of the layout was made by
horseback between Xenia and Springfield. He afterward began the survey with
instruments Xenia.
His observation found two tentative routes from Xenia to Springfield, one by
way of Yellow Springs which would cross the Little Miami above Old Town, the
other by way of Clifton in Greene County, which purposed to cross the river
at that location.
Costs of the project expenses of the two differed so little that neither had
a decided advantage.
At Clifton it was decided that the bridge abutments were natural to the lay
of the land; the distance of rock to rock could not exceed thirty feet. Actual
expenses to the bridge would be minimal.
The Yellow Springs route was adopted because it was shorter by a mile and a
quarter.
In an examination of the lower section of the line between Xenia and Cincinnati
it was proposed to run down the valley of Glady Run (near Spring Valley) for
six miles to the Little Miami valley.
He planned to cross the Little Miami below Waynesville and follow the west side
of the river to the Ohio.
This would avoid bridges being built over Caesar's Creek, Todd's Fork and East
Fork. Also he proposed on the fourteenth mile from Xenia, a point opposite Waynesville,
a sufficient crossing at the river could be found on the third quarter of the
sixteenth mile at Smith and Evan's mill.
The cost of the bridge at this location was estimated at $10,000.
Due to the time factor, the Professor did not have time to survey both sides
of the river at this time. His recommendation was that an accurate survey of
both sides be done.
The railroad was eventually located on the east side the greater portion of
the way. It crossed to the west side only a few miles above the Ohio. Subsequently,
bridges were built over Caesar's Creek and Todd's Fork, but not over East Fork.
The upper portion of the road contained the steepest grades; the quota allowed
was only 32 feet per mile. On the lower section the grades were constant with
a variance of 8 to 24 feet to the mile. No excessive cutting or filling was
needed on this portion.
On the deepest excavations the dirt needed to be handled but once and more than
half the excavation could be made without a cart of wheelbarrow.
Curves appeared quite often on the lower portion. Because of possible friction
caused on the sharper curves, the minimum radius of curvature permitted in the
original estimates was 1000 feet.
Only one long bridge on the road was called for, one of 132 feet. It could be
built entirely of timber. Five smaller bridges would be built along the same
lines.
The rails for the locomotive and cars were to run on wood on which was to be
laid iron less than one inch in thickness. The structure of the wood and rail
were thus: "Trenches across the road bed were to be dug, four feet from
center to center, and filled with screened gravel or broken stone, and on this
foundation timbers about seven feet long, like modern cross-ties, were to be
firmly embedded.
"Upon these, rails of oak, six by eight inches and twelve feet long, would
be fastened and upon them the iron rail would be placed and fastened by bolts,
or spikes."
Prof. Mitchel stated: "This superstructure is in general
use in the United States and is found to answer quite as well as any other.
"The string pieces usually employed on Eastern roads are Carolina pine;
we propose to use the timber of our own soil which may not be quite as durable,
but is believed will answer a good purpose. The iron rail estimated for us is
of the usual size, five eights of an inch thick and two and a half inches wide.
"I would recommend to the company the adoption of a thicker rail if heavy
locomotives are to be employed. The additional expense would not be great, to
diminish the width to two inches and increase the thickness to one inch."
(The old flat rail was used until 1850 when it was removed and replaced with
the heavy T rail.)
NOTICE: All documents and electronic images placed on the Warren County OHGenWeb site remain the property of the contributors, who retain publication rights in accordance with US Copyright Laws and Regulations. These documents may be used by anyone for their personal research. Persons or organizations desiring to use this material, must obtain the written consent of the submitter, or their legal representative, and contact the listed Warren County OHGenWeb coordinator with proof of this consent.
This page created 10 August 2004 and last updated
28 September, 2008
© 2004 Arne H Trelvik
All rights reserved